← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/34671/2024disposed of

Khushwant Singh And Others v. Union Territory, Chandigarh And Others

2025-10-31Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-34671-2024 Date of Decision: 31.10.2025 KHUSHWANT SINGH AND OTHERS

...Petitioners

Vs.

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Aman Pal, Addl. Standing Counsel for respondent U.T.

*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 19.12.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:- "Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that respondent No.2 is a society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860. It is financed and controlled by Chandigarh Administration. The petitioners are working with respondent No.2 for more than 10 years. They were appointed after following regular process. Their appointment was not a back-door entry. The respondent on the earlier occasion has also regularized employees who had completed 10 years of service. The respondent No.3 has recommended to respondent No.1 to regularize the petitioners. Notice of motion returnable for 05.03.2025.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.10.31 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-34671-2024 -2Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate who on advance notice is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and waives service. He seeks time to file reply and address the arguments."

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent would consider petitioner's representation dated 27.09.2024 (Annexure P-31) and pass an appropriate order within two months from today. 3.

In the wake of above statement of learned counsel for the respondent, the petition stands disposed of.

4.

It is made clear that respondent before addressing representation of the petitioners would take into consideration judgment of this Court titled 'Dildeep Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation Chandigarh and Ors.' 2025(3) SLJ 178. It is further made clear that in the intervening period no adverse order with respect to appointment of the petitioners would be passed.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE October 31, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.10.31 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document