Sukhwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Punjab

CWP-35057-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-35057-2024 Date of Decision : 20.12.2024 SUKHWINDER SINGH .... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr. Pardeep Singh Mirpur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punajb.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking directions to the respondents to decide representation dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure P-10). 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner has filed representation dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure P-10) seeking seniority, full salary, pay fixation, increments, arrears of pay and consequential benefits on notional basis. This Court vide order dated 04.04.2022 passed in CWP No.6995 of 2022 directed the respondents to decide similar demand notice. The respondents in compliance of directions of this Court has passed order dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-8) whereby Department has granted full pay benefit to the similarly situated employees. The petitioner is entitled to same relief. Anju Goel 2024.12.23 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-35057-2024 3.

Learned State counsel asserts that representation dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure P-10) of the petitioner shall be decided within two months from today. He further assures the Court that the competent authority while disposing representation dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure P-10) would consider order dated 05.12.2022 (Annexure P-8) passed by Additional Director General of Police.

4.

In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 20.12.2024 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Anju Goel 2024.12.23 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh