← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/62910/2025allowed

Sanjeev Kumar Goyal And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2026-01-20Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary2 pages

On 12.01.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel the matter stands com affirmed by learned co states that he has anticipatory bail.

for the petitioners submits that mpromised, a fact which is ounsel for the complainant and no objection for grant of Learned counsel are ready and willing t when required by the cooperate.

contends that the petitioners o join the investigation as and investigating agency and will Notice of motion.

At the asking of Atwal, DAG, Punjab respondent-State.

the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh accepts notice on behalf of Meanwhile, the p the investigation on or b petitioners are directed to join before 16.01.2026. In the event PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.21 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

of their arrest, they shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioners do not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 20.1.2026."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur. The cases filed by him against respondent No.2 stand withdrawn, however, needful has not been done by the latter.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Iqbal Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 12.01.2026 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.21 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.