Shakeel Ahamed v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-35109-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-35109-2024 Date of Decision: 20.12.2024 Sakeel Ahmed

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Kuljidner Singh Billing, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents no.3 and 4 to decide the representations, dated 28.03.2022, 30.05.2023 and 12.06.2023, Annexures P-4 to P-6, given by the petitioners.

2.

At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 28.03.2022, Annexure P-4, in a specified period.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Rohit Arya, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State, and submits that the pending representation, dated 28.03.2022, will be decided by the third respondentDeputy Commissioner, Nuh, by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of three months. 5.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2024.12.20 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-35109-2024 -26.

Ordered accordingly.

7.

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 20.12.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.12.20 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document