← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/63209/2025allowed

Man Mohit @ Mohit Bhan v. State Of Haryana

2026-02-19Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-63209-2025 DECIDED ON: 19.02.2026 MAN MOHIT @ MOHIT BHAN .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present:

Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1.

Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking grant of anticipatory bail, in case, FIR No.338, dated 18.10.2025, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, registered at Police Station City Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

2.

As per the allegations, total amount involved in the present case is Rs.11,33,084/-, which was allegedly paid by the complainant to the petitioner for arranging a UK visa. However, neither the visa was arranged nor the said amount was refunded.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, dispute between the petitioner and complainant, namely Komal Saini, has been amicably settled by way of a compromise. On the strength of the said compromise, he prays that present petition be allowed and anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner.

4.

On the other hand, learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Ram Parkash, verifies the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and states that, in view of the compromise arrived at LAVISHA 2026.02.19 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh

CRM-M-63209-2025 -2between the parties, statements of the concerned parties have also been recorded before learned trial Court, in terms of the order dated 24.12.2025 passed in CRM-M-73175-2025 filed by the petitioner, Man Mohit @ Mohit Bhan.

5.

In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the respective parties and considering the compromise effected between them, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the present petition. 6.

Accordingly, present petition is allowed, by directing the petitioner to join the investigation within two weeks from today, or as and when called by the investigating agency; and in the eventuality of the arrest, petitioner would be released on anticipatory bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). 7.

Besides, it is directed that petitioner would hand over his passport to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if he possesses. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that he does not possess any passport.

It is also directed that before leaving country any time during trial, petitioner would seek prior permission of the Court. 8.

With the directions issued here above, present petition stands disposed of.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) 19.02.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.02.19 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh