Amrish Sharma And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-63083-2025 Decided on :27.04.2026 AMRISH SHARMA AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present:
Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinay Malhotra DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Chandramani Kumar for respondent No. 2 to 3.
SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
1.
Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 01.11.2025(P-2), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No.
Date Section(s) Police Station 30.07.2017 452, 295, 294, 427, 323, 506, 34, 201 IPC City Khanna, Khanna 2.
Vide orders dated 18.02.2026 the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. 3.
Report has since been received from learned District and Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein,
the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4.
The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. The relevant part of the said report is reproduced herebelow: Sr.
No.
Description 1.
Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute/FIR Two accused 2.
Number of complainant/victim(s) Two victims/complainant 3.
Whether all the accused and complainant / victims are party to compromise & signed the same Yes 4.
In case, any affected person(accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing petition before High Court, detail whereas;
Or His/her statement is till to be recorded, in compliance to the direction of this Court, details of such person No complainant/accused has been left out in the petition and all have been arrayed as party in the petition. Whether any accused has been declared as a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated or pending adjudication No
Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary, and without any coercion or undue influence Yes Any other aspect relevant to the present case.
Nothing worth noticing reported 5.
Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and the private respondents are the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question. 6.
In view of the report of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, and the principles laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed.
7.
Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. 8.
Petition stands disposed of.
27.04.2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) Jyoti-V JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned:
YES/NO