High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/65138/2024allowed

Rajesh Sharma And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

2025-04-24Mr. Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu7 pages

!"#$%"&'('#)* + +

* ,- + . . .

" #$

&' . . /+ ( )'* &+ ! ! ','-. /& 01 +

2 +34&-5) '',*','6.781 6,5 6', 8',74 8*5,. /4 + $ &+

# 9 + +" 2 + + ( 8:8'','6 .7'1 (" " &' ' + "

* -'

,,,;7 <+ - Contends that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, i.e. petitioners as well as respondent No.2; hence FIR in question as well as consequential proceedings deserve to be quashed. -1-

) = &' !" + ( 5 Still further, learned State Counsel, on instructions from the police officer present, is not averse in case the above FIR along with consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties i.e. petitioners well as respondent No.2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paperbook. * > "

+ ',,8',')

! "# $ % $

& $

'($ $ $ $

$ $ ! %%

) *

% !+,') * !($ , %% $ ,( - $

) * -2-

. ,( - $

) *$ - /$ % $ $ 0 1# (i) Whether the statements of the parties are bona fide and not result of any pressure or coercion etc. in any manner? (ii) Whether the compromise effected between the parties is genuine and valid?

(iii) Whether all the accused, complainant and injured are party to the compromise and if not, the details/particulars of such person(s)?

(iv) Whether any other case is pending against either of the parties or not, if yes, the details thereof?

(v) Whether any of the persons involved in this case/dispute has been declared a proclaimed offender?

(vi) Whether any of the petitioner(s) is/are previous convict or not?

(9) List before this Court on 04.03.2025 for further consideration.

(10) Meanwhile, learned State Counsel shall also get the instructions in the matter as to whether the State has any objection?

(11) Copy of this order be sent to learned Judicial Officer concerned forthwith for information and strict compliance." ? In terms of aforesaid order, statements of both the parties were recorded and a report dated 18.02.2025 has been received from @ + 3 9 &+ @+

. For reference, the operative part of report reads as under:-

!""##"$$%$&#' "$&&(%"#)$#( $"* ", $ , % 2)

0$3*+,'

-3-

+,-".)/0"

!% , $

$ $ % $ % ($ , $ , % 2 $ , 45-6'

6$ )

0$ 3*

+,'

! 12#31."&%1$""."&34, 4'"."& % $ '/

5!"""$66" ("%(%"#"(7 , $ , % 2)

0$3* "8 4

5 !"" ( " ,#, " $)"9$#$#&((7 5 +$ , % 2 $

5 !""("), $,$7:

4 , $ , % 2$

%$ ! % !

!"""&("9( # ( $$ $ &7 !"" " $&& (($ 9; " 6,#* -4-

7 ($!

$ % %

%$ ! $ !

$ $

$ $ $ 8 9 $ !$ , % ! ($ $ %! -% !

% %

%$ ! !% / +,' ($ ($ :% !

$ ! ;

, $!%

% $ $ !

$ $ $

$ $$ <

!% $! ! % $

0$) -%*

0$:= ) $

- *> 8, 0( ' ).')012+.! !"#$3)4 5/

/ 7 8"9 % $

$ $ 1 $ ($ +,' 0

/$ % $$ $

5? , $ $! $ 0 $ $%@1)* $ -5-

/$ )*% $

$, ($ +,'!0 %% $$ $ ! % 0 $ $$ %$ $ %! $

$ %! & $ !

!($ %

$%%A ! %

$ $ % $ % $ ! !

! %

$ $ & % $ !$ % & !

% ! ($ %% $ :$ % % ! !%%$

$ ($ $! % $&

$ ! !

! $ ! % $ % % $, !

$!($ % $ %

! % & $ $$$

/$ 0 /$ $$ ! ($ $ %,

$ $

$$ ! /$ $ $ $ $ -6-

% $ /$ $

%($ ) * % $ /$

($ > 88 In view of above discussion, this Court is fully convinced that the offence is entirely personal in nature and does not involve public funds. Thus, quashing of the FIR in question along with consequential proceedings, on the basis of compromise would bring peace and harmony to secure the ends of justice.

2 " A 34+ " 2 + + 2 ($ + .1 + +

. .

$ !""<6) = ) !""9# = ) -7-