Vikash Sharma v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-64106-2025 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64106-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.11.2025 Vikash Sharma ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Ms. Anu Garg, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0121 dated 05.06.2025, registered under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act at Police Station Industrial Area, Bhiwani, District Bhiwani.

2.

Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 5. He alleges false implication. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co-accused Arun, from whom, alleged recovery of contraband have been effected and is stated to have purchased the same from the petitioner, who had purchased it from co-accused Manoj, who has since been granted bail vide order dated 06.11.2025, Annexure P-2. There is no recovery effected from the petitioner. He is not involved in any other case. Challan was presented on 15.11.2025, however, charges have not been framed. In all there are 18 prosecution witnesses.

3.

The custody certificate dated 18.11.2025, filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 5

CRM-M-64106-2025 (O&M) 2 months and 14 days.

4.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations levelled by the co-accused in his disclosure statement that the petitioner had supplied the contraband recovered from him. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to the stage, co-accused having been granted bail and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 5.

Heard.

6.

 


 

  





 




  


 














 







 
 
  

 



  
  
 






 
 

 

!
    




"

"

  




   


   


 




 

# 



    

$


 
  

 

7.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

(ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of.

(v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce,

CRM-M-64106-2025 (O&M) 3 induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner.

(vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court.

(viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court.

(ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner.

(x) The petitioner shall also report to the concerned Police Station on the 1st of every month.

8.

It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order.

9.

In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 19.11.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No