Lalita Rani v. State Of Haryana And Others










 

 












CRM-M-65793-2025 



 !

"

LALITA RANI  





















 

 #

 $%
#
 &
' 
&
 (





)))))   



!
"#"$ %
 & '#


(

"
 

 






)))))
' 
&
 (*

+ ,-.

"
  
 

"#
*
( +
, -
.$#"

-
(
/#+#

#
$


'

0
(
"
1!
#
2332
#


 
4

#
2332
  
*5
"
16%
 + '
#

!""## %
  '
#7$ #
#-#
#
8#-# "#
#

#+
$77

-

 '
#
33439
#
*5
"
8$ ' #+
#-  #%

!+#%
#7$ #
#-# 




:#


Counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued at length that the petitioner was not associated by the respondent-authorities to substantiate her allegations with respect to the incident that took place on 09.10.2023. The report of /#+#

# has however been perused wherein it has been specifically recorded that the message was sent to the complainant to associate in the investigation, however, she did not join the same whereas the respondents specifically led evidence by way of CCTV footage of their VISHAL SHARMA 2025.12.04 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 #/#/0"123/ "



house, showing that at the relevant point in time, they were present in their house and even the CDRs of the mobiles of both the nominated persons were also called for which reflected their presence at their house and not at the place of occurrence as alleged.

Faced with the above, Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition at this stage so as to take all pleas before the trial Court at an appropriate stage.

Dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid.









+' 
&
 (.

#
*
"









 
  
;""
#, -6 #



6



;""


#*+

6
VISHAL SHARMA 2025.12.04 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document