Mohd. Khalid @ Khalid Malik @ Partapa v. State Of Punjab And ANR
1 IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH +, 2 30 + + -. +
/00 0
0 0 !)
!"#$% &'()% !) # ( Mr. $ $(&
# ( *&
. " 4 4
/0& 1 6( "
'
, (
( # $2 -
)(
"
",4(*" !
. " " "!
! . ** !# $ %&'
(
) (*# $
" !
! !(
5 5 * * " +* " " , ( ! * * -
5 ( !
!
! *
)(
) ! 7 '
( * " & ! " '
, ( ,4 * !! *1
/
/ *"!" ! . !
!
" : " " !
! !
! (
! !
/ / !!
* *
!
& ! * 9 9! " (
/ /( * * * 4 ( ! !
/( * * 1 "
"
/ /
/( * ! * ! " "
4 5( ! * -
;
( *( ! 6 "
!
!* ! " $ Gura appa 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali Gugal and d others vs. State of Mysore : 1 i Vs.
State of H Haryna : 2020(2) RCR (Criminal l) 339. / # (** 4
/(! * <
/** ! " 6 " However, while adjourn ning the case to o 12.10.2017, the learned trial Co ourt failed to consider the fact th hat 1 ! " !
! " < ! *
* ! * 6 " $ 1 ! & '
'
! "# $ %% &"(* ! * ** ( *!
/0&1 6( " '
,(
( # $ 2 -
)(
" ,4 (*" ! (
*
!
5*( * * 4( <
5 "(" - =2 " " ( ! < " < " " **
2 " ( !1 " 1 " ! !
. ( !"
! * *4!"( !! (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE + + +
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No