Sukhdev Singh @ Bunty v. State Of Punjab

On 13.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel subm and cross version and a complainant on 29.05.2025.

against him, he was armed w came to be inflicted by hi injury as per the MLR. Co Kaur, Chiman Singh and S have been granted interim dated 28.10.2025 and 04.11 He is not involved in any willing to join the investiga the investigating agency and mits that it is a case of version GD has been filed by the As per the allegations leveled with a dang and a simple injury im while he also received an o-accused Krishna Rani, Diyal Sajjan Singh @ Gajjan Singh, anticipatory bail vide orders 1.2025, Annexures P4 and P5.

other case. He is ready and ation as and when required by d will cooperate.

Notice of motion.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 24.11.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 22.01.2026."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Baldev Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 13.11.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.