Bhola Singh v. State Of Punjab








 

 

  
















 





!"!

#$
%%

&
'




' 
(




 $
) &
 %
'
%'%
 * &%
++++
 
 
 



 




 


 

%'%
 * &,
%
- &.










 
!"#

Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.179 dated 18.08.2021 under Section 302, 34 of IPC and Section 25/27-54-59 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran.

Notice of motion.

Mr. P.S. Pandher, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State and contends that the entire prosecution evidence has been concluded before the trial Court.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submits that all the private prosecution witnesses have turned hostile and have deposed nothing against the petitioner. He, therefore, prays for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner does not intend to lead any defence evidence before the trial Court.

RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.11.28 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order

 

 
Be that as it may, since the entire prosecution evidence has been over and the trial is at its fag end, no ground is made out at this stage to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may lead his defence evidence before the trial Court and the trial Court is requested to decide the case as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date fixed next before it.

Disposed of in above terms.

Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to file the application afresh in case the trial Court fails to decide the case within three months, subject to the condition that no unnecessary adjournments will be sought by the petitioner.

-%'%
 * &.
/ 
,
%




























 









      
   
RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.11.28 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order