Union Of India v. Nk Ashok Kumar
!" '1'2 #$%$!&'
13'1'2 ++++++++ $ $!& .-%0
++++++++ %4!&5 & -%0 )* + * )* + 5 6 2#)3 &7. / /
,+-.
/ /0 / & &
-87 "& # & 9 -) :
!
! "
#$ $% . / &
" %& & #
% ()&##
;)
#* #%& %& & + ),-&& ' ;; <$ + ) )
)&)
4 & ) $
+ $ && )# 012 0
&&& # . / & # 0 1 2 0 ) 01 3&) / 34
" '
( (7 & # & )& & #
' * #%& & )#= ##
< > % & % $ / & / -)#
?
< $ <
)& # % $ 7 2 3# & 23 " %(
;
$ ) 23 <
?
# ( ) ;
# % ;) #* # ) ( # %&*% 23
$ $ * #% 8 ;) #)= & % & % $ & )& (# ) #%$ & &# & & ) & % 2 3# & 23 "$ (# %)& $ % & & % & $ &# & #&
;
/)# )& & -) :
$ )& * #%& & ) $$ $ + # # )
3 8
% & && $ % & + )
$ ) # $ + # # & 01 3&) / + ) )&)
: $ 2'1'6
(
% ) &
$ ) $ % #
7.
As for the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that operation of judgment passed by the Delhi High Court, granting benefit of condonation in qualifying service, by relying upon judgment in Shama Kaur's case (supra), has been stayed, it should be noted that the decision of the 013&) / !
$ 34 " '
(7 #$ # 013&) / $ * #% % & & # <) #= % & $ # * , 013&) / * # % & # < ) $ + $ # = )
# & # ( ) # &
6&%$ # )$ && $ $
< -8 7 " & # &% && $
?
&$& )
&& # &
- 0 7 <7 ; 3&@# - *0
> &=A B > &'