Amrik Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab

On 20.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel have been falsely implicate fact that the complainant hi kundi connection, which w however, No.1 has not Department, involved being not even present at the tim petitioners are not involve ready and willing to join t required by the investigatin l submits that the petitioners d in the case on account of the imself was at fault for having a as detected by petitioner No.2, even connected with the g brother of No.2 and was also me of the alleged incident. The ed in any other case and are the investigation as and when g agency and will cooperate.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of th DAG Punjab accepts notice he Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, e on behalf of respondent-State.

Meanwhile, the pet investigation on or before their arrest, they shall be r satisfaction of the Arr compliance of conditions a

(2) BNSS.

titioners are directed to join the e 27.11.2025. In the event of released on interim bail to the resting Officer, subject to as enshrined under Section 482 PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.10 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioners do not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 10.12.2025."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur. 4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Parminderjeet Kaur affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 20.11.2025 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.10 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.