Rajneesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Another

On 09.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel P-4, which is the report o wherein initial complaint categoric finding returned th and money was advanced b versa, for which bank statem fact, the complainant is a c petitioner is his brother-in-la any other and is ready and w as and when required by the cooperate.

l while referring to Annexure of Economic Offences Wing, had been submitted and a hat it is a case of civil dispute by the petitioner and not vicement is referred. As a matter of crypto currency dealer and the aw and is also not involved in willing to join the investigation e investigating agency and will Notice of motion.

At the asking of the C DAG, Punjab accepts notice Ms. Manisha Singh, Advoca Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, e on behalf of respondent-State.

ate, for Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.17 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant and made their respective submissions in opposition.

Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 11.03.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 17.03.2026."

3.

Learned Senior Counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore-mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Devender affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 09.03.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.03.17 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.