Bhoop Singh v. State Of Haryana And Another

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M-67390-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 01.12.2025 Bhoop Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (438 of Cr.P.C.), has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.339 dated 21.05.2025, registered under Sections 61, 351(2), 318(4), 316(2) of Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 24, 10 of Immigration Act, at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna Nagar.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has received amount of Rs.1 Lakh in his account from the account of the complainant qua wrong transfer. He further contended that the petitioner is ready to return the said amount of Rs. 1 lakh through demand draft favouring complainant Suresh Sharma, and has handed over the same to learned counsel for the complainant, a photocopy of said demand draft is taken on record. 3.

Notice of motion.

GEETA RANI 2025.12.05 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

CRM-M-67390-2025 (O&M) ( 2 ) 4.

Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana, puts in appearance as advance copy of petition had been served to respondent-State. Mr. Sandeep Kashyap, Advocate also puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant is ready to receive the aforesaid demand draft of Rs.1 Lakh and he has no objection if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail.

5.

Heard.

6.

Keeping in view the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties, and as the petitioner has returned the amount of Rs.1 Lakh to the complainant, thus, nothing remains left to be adjudicated. Hence, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).

7.

Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed to be expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case. ( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 01.12.2025 JUDGE Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2025.12.05 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh