Kishan Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-36004-2025 Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 KISHAN SINGH

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ashish Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Vashisht, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.3 to decide his representation dated 13.11.2024.

2.

On 15.12.2025, the following order was passed:- "Counsel for the petitioner submits that although a complaint given by him, was disposed of vide Annexure P1 and it has been found that there is no encroachment, but a perusal of proceedings dated 22.11.2023, Annexure P-8, of Gram Panchayat, Billochpur, show that land of Gram Panchayat has been encroached upon.

Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the official respondents.

State counsel requests for deferment to get instructions and file an affidavit."

3.

As per resolution dated 22.11.2023 of Gram Panchayat, the matter was referred to Girdawal Halqa/Local Commissioner who vide Annexure P-10 prepared demarcation report. The parties were granted opportunity to file objection.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.30 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-36004-2025 -23.

Learned State counsel on instructions from Ms. Upma, DDPO, Palwal, submits that jurisdictional Sub-Divisional Magistrate is enquiring the matter and an appropriate order would be passed within six months from today.

4.

In the wake of statement of learned State Counsel, the petition stands disposed of.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 30, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.30 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document