Mohd Arif v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-68927 of 2025 Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 Mohd. Arif ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present:

None for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1.

This petition for bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of 'the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023'. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 79 dated 30.05.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of 'the Indian Penal Code, 1860' Police Station City Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana.

2.

Despite repeated call, nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner. Waited sufficiently.

3.

It has been submitted by the learned State counsel that the direction with regard to deposit of ₹5,00,000/-, by the petitioner, has not been complied with.

DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.02.28 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Criminal Misc. No. M-68927 of 2025 4.

In view of above, the present petition is hereby dismissed in default as well as non-compliance of the order dated 22.01.2026. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge February 27, 2026 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.02.28 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document