Sukhwinder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH (116)
Date of decision: 14.01.2026 Date of uploading: 14.01.2026 Sukhwinder Singh ....Petitioner V/s ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:
***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1.
The appellant has preferred the present appeal impugning the order dated 21.11.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur and !
"#$ #%#&'#'$
$#'
$#( $') $'$ $%"
"%& "%* "'#+, '#"-.
$/'0/0 -12
3 2.
The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the FIR was lodged on the statement of the complainant by alleging that when he and Sikander Singh were going to their village on his motorcycle bearing No. PB-13-AV-1708 and when they reached about 1 KM ahead of bridge on
P a g e | 2 the area of village Balia then at about 12:30 P.M., one white colour vehicle came ahead of their motorcycle which was followed by 5-7 persons on 3-4 motorcycles. Thereafter, Tejinder Singh and his brother, namely, Sukhjinder Singh @ Bhola, came out of vehicle and other motor riders came towards them and they all were armed with iron rods, sticks and thereafter, they threw chilli powder from an envelope towards their faces, due to which chilli powder entered into their eyes. Thereafter, Sukhjinder Singh raised lalkara that instead of daily dispute with regard to land with them, they will finish them and started giving beatings to them. They have given iron rod blow on the left side of the chest of the complainant and caused injuries on his hands, shoulders, stomach, right thigh and right leg. Thereafter, Tejinder Singh along with Sukhjinder Singh have also caused injuries to Sikander Singh deceased and thus, the instant FIR got registered. $
4 5 6
5
5 7 4
8 8 5 54 9 ,
5 5
5
4 8 8
54 8 5 54
8 :5 5
P a g e | 3
8 5 8
2 5 5 5 8 5
$#' -
5
5 5 ; 8 8 8
8
5
5 4 - 8
$#' -
4
!
+ 8 8
543 5 < :5
"""''#'$ #=#''#') '(#''#') /
; +$ +)0 7 5
5 '4 2
4 %
4 "%#"'#'= - 8
)
P a g e | 4 = 2 8
#(""'#'$ 8
8 8
$#"#'#'$ $=
8
-
;5
5
8 5 2
,
2 -
5
54 !
8
5
8
="
4 "%#"'#'= 4
'4
'5
(4 .
1 7 8 5
4
6
8 5 6
4
15
5 7
> 5 -
!?3
, 5
> - 7 - " ##
$%% . 5 - & ' ( & ) * +,
'*""'#'"
-. +,## (
#
P a g e | 5 Suffice to say, the further detention of the appellant in custody is not required in the facts and circumstances of the case. (
8
8
1 4
-@134 7 8
54 5
4
-@134 5
4 8
A+ (i) The appellant shall not mis-use the liberty granted. (ii) The appellant shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial.
(iii) The appellant shall not absent himself on any date before the trial.
(iv) The appellant shall not commit any offence while on bail.
(v) The appellant shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court.
(vi) The appellant shall give his cell phone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.
(vii) The appellant shall not in any manner try to delay the trial.
&
8 54 5
4
-@134
8 1 5 4 5
* B 4
P a g e | 6 "# !
;
5 11.
Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 14.01.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No