Muhammad Asraf @ Mohd Ashraf v. State Of Punjab

2.

On 09.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel version and cross-version petitioner is of having cau the complainant with a dan while he himself also recei No.67 of 2025, one of w namely, Mohammad Sule since been granted interim Annexure P-3. He is not ready and willing to join required by the investigatin Notice of motion.

At the asking of th DAG, Punjab, accepts no State and Mr. Gaurav Vir S l contends that it is a case of n. The allegation against the sed injuries on the forehead of nda, which are simple in nature ived 4 injuries as per the MLR which was sharp. Co-accused, man and Sameer Mohd. have m anticipatory bail, vide order t involved in any other case;

the investigation as and when ng agency and will cooperate.

he Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, otice on behalf of respondentSingh Behl, Advocate, appears PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.17 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

on behalf of the complainant and made submissions in opposition.

Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 16.12.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 22.12.2025."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 09.12.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.17 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.