Mandeep And Another v. The Trade Union U T Chandigarh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-37280-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 MANDEEP AND ANOTHER

...Petitioners

Vs.

THE TRADE UNION U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Divanshu Jain, Addl. Standing Counsel with Ms. Mahima Dogra, Jr. Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of election result dated 08.09.2025 declared by respondents No.4 and 5. 2.

The petitioners are members of Indian Bank Officers Association. Respondents No.2 and 3 on 20.08.2025 issued notification inviting applications for election. The petitioners raised multiple objections. They claimed that they filed nomination, however, respondents rejected their nomination on the ground that it was filed after stipulated time. They served legal notice upon respondents, however, respondent declared result on 08.09.2025.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.24 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-37280-2025 -23.

From the perusal of record, it is evident that there is dispute primarily between private parties. The election stands concluded. 4.

Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail any other alternative remedy as permissible by law.

5.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 24, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.24 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document