← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/70162/2025allowed

Bijender v. State Of Haryana

2026-01-27Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj5 pages



              



!"#"

$% &&      &&&    '(( (    &&&(   %  )* & ( 

( +  

 





 

 



 



   ( +,

& -*.

!

  



#$% & '(!

 )! (* )()+ "

 )( ), & 

 !,-.

/  )*0

& 

   1  



0 .-

 #  )

"      )! (* )()+     &

 " " 3 4

" 5"



" $  "  "

     



" &

 !,.

7 -!(  3 

"  "

   

  #$%   

"  &

    "

  6 "



 " 

   

"  

   "4   " 6   "

  "  )9 (* )()+          



 " # 

2 



    



 " # 



    )* (. )().





 

2

  ; "





 " "



  0"      " "







 "4 2

  " "

 0"    2 "4

 < 

" 

2 < 

"    !- !) )().





" "

 2 "4





< 

" "

  



" "





  )9 (* )()+

   +  



 "

 

"

  2 0

 "  6 



" 0"  &

" "

    2 !,.

7 !-( 

/ 3  2 

 5"

" "

 9* & 

 

 " "

  9'

" 2 ('



=  

  "

  .

 '

  "     

 0"  

  2 "4   





< 

" $ 0"  

   

:"

 " 2"  2

  (!

 ('

  (.

  )' (! )()'

$ "   

6"  9'

" 2

('



= * $ 2  "     

"  





> 

"        

  ! "



 2  2

> 

" $  > 

" =  2 "0

19. A plain and literal interpretation of the conditions under Section 37 (i.e., that Court should be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and would not commit any offence) would effectively exclude grant of bail altogether, resulting in punitive detention and unsanctioned preventive detention as well. Therefore, the only manner in which

0 such special conditions as enacted under Section 37 can be considered within constitutional parameters is where the court is reasonably satisfied on a prima facie look at the material on record (whenever the bail application is made) that the accused is not guilty. Any other interpretation, would result in complete denial of the bail to a person accused of offences such as those enacted under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

20. xxxxx 21.

.....it would be important to reflect that laws which impose stringent conditions for grant of bail, may be necessary in public interest; yet, if trials are not concluded in time, the injustice wrecked on the individual is immeasurable.

22. xxxxx

23. There is a further danger of the prisoner turning to crime, "as crime not only turns admirable, but the more professional the crime, more honour is paid to the criminal"22 (also see Donald Clemmer's 'The Prison Community' published in 194023). Incarceration has further deleterious effects 3 where the accused belongs to the weakest economic strata: immediate loss of livelihood, and in several cases, scattering of families as well as loss of family bonds and alienation from society. The courts therefore, have to be sensitive to these aspects (because in the event of an acquittal, the loss to the accused is irreparable), and ensure that trials - especially in cases, where special laws enact stringent provisions, are taken up and concluded speedily.

- 

 2"



 "  





 , 2"     7 2 " 4

  

  2

 



"

?"

   8 :"?

"

 & 

  

 =  )* (! )()'

-( +.

renubala

 @  4? A?& @    A?&