Harpinder Singh Alias Raju v. State Of Punjab

On 11.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel 2 days in lodging the FI named in the FIR nor in of the complainant, how statement of co-accused he came to be implicate bail vide order dated Otherwise, it is a case o supplementary statement co-accused had alleged petitioner is not involve willing to join the inves by the investigating agen Notice of motion.

At the asking of th DAG, Punjab. accepts n State.

contends that there is delay of IR. The petitioner was neither n the supplementary statement wever, it was in the disclosure d, Diwan Singh alias Rajan that ed, who has since been granted 18.11.2025, Annexure P-1.

of no injury and as per the 3rd t of the complainant, the above dly fired at his house. The ed in any other case; ready and stigation as and when required ncy and will cooperate.

he Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, notice on behalf of respondentPARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.23 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-69766-2025 -2Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 17.12.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.

Adjourned to 23.12.2025."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from the investigating officer, affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 11.12.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.12.23 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.