← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/70740/2025dismissed

Vinay v. State Of Haryana

2026-03-23Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra5 pages

CRM-M-70740-2025 -1-  

                       

     Sr. No.

Particulars Details The date when the judgment is reserved 19.03.2026 The date when the judgment is pronounced 23.03.2026 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 23.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full judgment is pronounced Full The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and reasons thereof Not applicable      



   

     



  



!



  !  """        #   

!  

$%&

  '  ( )  )    *+*& ,

 -'

./ 0 )( ( (!  0!   0 

 12%  13+2*+** (

 

&+**+1 45   6 6

 7        0  ( 58823&98*+*$ 0 

 

 1:+:*+*:

CRM-M-70740-2025 -2- *

 !! ( 13+2*+** 0   

 !(

0

 ( !

!!

! 6 !4  

  0  

 &+*  (

 4 (  

(     ; 19+2*+**7( (!

(   ! 0

       



) 

     

 

    ( 1:+2*+**

0  !

( 0   !

)(<  !  !  

 

) 

  ) 0 !

(  

)  

!

  

0 (   

 ( 



    

!

 ) 

(

  

 

  ( 1:+2*+**    !

  #  

8

  # 

*1+2*+**#   

!

 



   !   

  

 !

#    0

    



  !

 0  (

 

    

(

     7  =! 6 !# 

!

(

0

 

  

 !     0 

 

  !

  !  

8

   ! 

!!  

 

4 (  

! 

CRM-M-70740-2025 -3- &     (  0 !   

 ! 

    



!  1:+:*+*:

!

(

 

!*1 &:

 

 0  > 

 ?    0

    





)

0!# ! !! ) 

 

! 

 !

!0 

 0 (



4 

 ( 

 

!  0! $  !   

 ! ( 

  0 (

  

 0! #  ( 



 # !   (     

     *1 

 !(

! 

 > #

(

!0 

 !

!

!# 

 0

(



!

 >   0   0!Therefore, it is stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.

: #  5

      !   

 ! 

  

 

 0! ! (  3   <  0!   0 (



0!

  0     

  (

  

 0!! 

0!     5

 !  

(  <  0!! 

 

(

  

 

)   

   )     !   

@;!

CRM-M-70740-2025 -4-

       (  



<  0  

 



(! 0!

  

(  ! 

<

4    ( 



 #   ! 0   

1:+:*+*: 0

( ! 

# 

!  

 *1 &:

 

 0  > 

 !

!0   !

  The allegations against the petitioner are quite serious in nature. While length of incarceration is a factor that weighs with the Court in considering bail, it cannot overshadow the seriousness of the accusation of murder under Section 302 of IPC. There exists a genuine apprehension that his release may imperil the course of trial and undermine the integrity of the trial and could pose a risk by influencing unexamined witnesses or tampering with evidence. It is wellsettled proposition of law that grant of bail is a discretionary relief to be granted or denied based on specific facts and circumstance of each case and there cannot be any exhaustive parameters set out for considering the application for grant of bail.

The factors such as nature of accusations, severity of punishment if the accusations entail a conviction and nature of evidence in support of accusations are to be seen. That apart, reasonable apprehension of tampering with evidence or threatening the complainant is also to be weighed. Frivolity of prosecution should always be considered,     ! !



   

( 0!

CRM-M-70740-2025 -5- !

 !!

! 

!  

!

( 



  



 ! ((

0!   !! ( 

   

> 0 

      

   

 

 

  

!

"# $$ %&  $'(

)!"#

$$  $  *     ! +!,$ ! -) .

.  !!

/ 

 In light of the foregoing legal principles, this Court finds no compelling ground to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

8.

 !  

   0  

!!

   >

  

 !!

! 

 

! 2         !

 0      ( !   

         $  %           &'#!'() *