Parminder Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
33142 $ %& 6 % *38- -339 9
!
"# : $ $ % 5!!
!$$ %&'
() %$# --- 7/%
$7 7 * +,!-!
!, ,
!
,
) ' !
+ '
) '*, ''- . ) ) '
) + !'
/ !#.
!
"
0000 "# "/.0-1.2 * 1 2 / $ $5
#3 ($3 4 >
( $5 $(
6)7 8* * 9 9 :+!
!
" #$ $& $
9 9 ;< =
% # $& $ 9 9
'
( $$) ) * * 9 9 !
? 9 9
*
%
& $$ )
* ' *
7 %
* # " 5 $( 4 @ )
'
<
$# $3 9' +. / ($@
!
9 / > & $3 8 '
<
! %
/ /
" ! 1 2 1 2 / /
' %4
# ?
/
!
@
?
# ! /
@ @ ?
/
1 2 !
?
/ ! !
! ! / / ) !
.
@ @ .
@ ?
.
)
?
" , "' +.
@
$ % % % B 7B4 % 4 '
!
!
!
?
! /
5
'Madhukar and others vs. T The State of Maharashtra and d another', 20 025 LiveLaw (SC)710, B E 4 C
#3
4
4
5& 4 .
!
D
D
!
B E !
!
! ! ! 4
*
8 / !
!
D
!
! %
( !
D
1
!B 7 'Ma adhukar and others vs. The State e of Maharashtra and another', , arranting exercise of discretion aw (SC)710, it is a fit case wa n 2025 LiveLa under Section n 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksh a Sanhita, 2023.
4 !1 2/ $ $5
#3 3 ($3 4 > ( $5 $( $ !
1!,
!
,2 2 38- -339 * @2
2 ,@/ ,@/