← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/70344/2025disposed of

Gurdeep Singh v. State Of Haryana

2026-01-29Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-70344-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-70344-2025 Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 GURDEEP SINGH .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Dhiraj Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of order dated 22.08.2025 passed by learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Fatehabad vide which the bail and bail bonds of the petitioner have been cancelled and forfeited to the Sate and non-bailable warrants of arrest has been issued to the petitioner in FIR No. 2 dated 01.01.2024 under Sections 34,379B, 452 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad with a further prayer that operation of impugned order dated 22.08.2025 may kindly be stayed.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner failed to appear before the trial Court on 22.08.2025 as the petitioner was in custody from 22.08.2025 in FIR No. 160 and thereafter, he was granted bail by ld. JMIC, Moonak vide order dated 16.09.2025. As such trial Court cancelled the bail order of the petitioner, his bail bonds were ordered to be forfeited to the State and arrest warrants were issued against the petitioner. Learned counsel Renu Rawat 2026.01.30 14.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-70344-2025 for the petitioner further prays that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and the impugned order dated 22.08.2025 be set aside.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Tapan Masta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 22.08.2025 passed by learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Fatehabad. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 07 days from today at 10:00 A. M and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of 03 days. 7.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 29.01.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2026.01.30 14.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document