Naushad And Another v. State Of Haryana
-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Decided on: 12.12.2025
......Petitioners Versus
......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present:
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1.
!"#$
#%#& '
()$!%& %*++#%#,
+-%+-+.&/++,+#*.#/ &#!.!/ &,+.#/ &&& $ 0
1 2 1 # () 4 5
5'
6 %*++#%#, -7%%
(' $ . / 8
5
+,6#%
6
8
('
-2- 5
5'
&6! ' 5'
'
5
5'
# :
)
'
'
5
('5 '
5
2 & $ !
5
6 5 5
, :
() He however does not dispute the fact that alleged offences qua the present petitioners are triable by the Magistrate
-3and the maximum sentence for the said offences is upto 07 years. He also did not controvert the fact that the petitioners are having clean antecedents. *
; 1 5
that offences in the present FIR are triable by the Magistrate and the maximum punishment for the alleged offences provided under the relevant provisions of law is 07 years; the petitioners are having clear antecedents and are not involved in any other case except the present case; the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to join the investigation, as and when required by the Investigating Officer and as the offences in the present case are punishable upto 07 years, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another (2014), 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51.
8.
The present petition stands disposed of. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 12.12.2025 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable:
YES/NO