← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/71080/2025disposed of

Jaipal And ORS. v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2026-03-25Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

CRM-M-71080-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-71080-2025 Date of decision: 25.03.2026 JAIPAL AND ORS.

.... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Dhruv Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG Haryana.

Ms. Shivani Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2. (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.403 dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 115, 126, 351(3) of BNS (initially registered under Sections 190, 191(3), 115, 126, 351(3) BNS later amended) at Police Station Karnal Sadar along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2. Vide order dated 11.02.2026, this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise and affidavit dated 20.11.2025 (Annexures P-3 and P-4).

The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order. Pursuant to the order dated 11.02.2026 passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Karnal and as per the report dated 05.03.2026 submitted to KUSUM 2026.03.26 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh

CRM-M-71080-2025 this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.

A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complaint coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".

In view of the aforesaid report of the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Karnal accompanied by statements of both the parties, the FIR No.403 dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 115, 126, 351(3) of BNS (initially registered under Sections 190, 191(3), 115, 126, 351(3) BNS later amended) at Police Station Karnal Sadar along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 25.03.2026 Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2026.03.26 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC Chandigarh