Mukesh v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#!$%&%"'( )* +*
,
-
( ./ * - ! !" #### - 0* / CRM-15170-2026 The instant application has been filed for placing on record the testimony of the victim/complainant i.e. respondent No.2 as Annexure A-1. For the reasons recorded in the application, the application is allowed. Annexure A-1 is taken on record.
CRA-S-3952-2025 (main case) $ %
& '"$""'"(
* &
+ ) ) ,-./! & ) ) &01 !$22$''3"'"( $$(4"5.."465 2,2(4"5/! .4$54 5.4$54 57.4"54568% 4 $'-/!5 & !
)
" %
01 )+9
! "
"# $%&' !
& # ("'& # " !
& !)*+
#'
& #, !*-./01*1' # *'*'1.!*2/3&
# '
'
'-/4&& # #'
5
#
'6 , 37 '37
& #
'& # 37 " , " ( ' & #
! 37 ! 37 #
#! .2+
1 #& # !
# '& "
2
!
! 37 ,!"! 8 ' /2*21/1. " !#& #' "
" ' 9 3
3 " : %# /:*:1/1. :
;
. :
&"$
) 01 8 ; &
;& +1
+ + < '3'3"'"( ) ;+ er family members assaulted the appellant. It is further submitted that the appellant sustained serious injuries in the violent assault, as is corroborated by his MLR. Learned counsel highlights material contradictions between the initial complaint lodged by the father of the prosecutrix and the subsequent FIR, contending that the allegations leveled in the present FIR are an afterthought to shield the family of the prosecutrix from legal consequences. It is submitted that & )
& &
& 68%
&
'=
"= , &
!" ) ) + ) !"
5.
4
) +
&
'=
"= 1 & %
$2.6 6+ ) 6
% &
+ "'$$"'"( "' +
'.
) ;
+
& &
) =
) 2 / && ) )
>)
+
<1' !
! != !
! ! !' != !
"
""' " ! !
>
'
"!
! " " !
'
11'?
!
'? " ! !
< < "' ! > ! !
! "
! " !
! !" '< -
& ) & ) "'$$"'"(? . "' +
) ; % &
%
'=
"= 1
3 @
+ & & ) + )
&
& & & )
)
&
) & &
$' )
&&
& +
+ +
; % &
) + ;
& A 6
) &
&+
A
% &
) "$ 6 1+ & )&
9
% & + )&
+
& B)
A ;C
C)
!
"# $ % &'
( )%$ & %
* $$ & +
A
< & ) )
&< )8
) 6
8 &
)A +&
9 45% + +
& 45% +
D8 +
5 45% + ) 6
;
; 45%
+ +
+
45 %
< +
&
+ 45% + 9
+ ; )
& 9
$" 1 ) )
)) ) ) 6
$. 1 ) )
A & )
)
;
$, &
4 5
- 12%3 )0
,
5 #: @ A:% 5 ! @ A:%