← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/71488/2025disposed of

Daler Singh v. State Of Punjab

2026-01-20Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 20.01.2026 DALER SINGH ....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Naveen Kuhad, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-1602-2026 This application has been filed for placing on record order dated 19.12.2025 passed by ld. Addl.Sessions Judge, Ferozepur as Annexure P-5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and order dated 19.12.2025 passed by ld. Addl.Sessions Judge, Ferozepur is ordered to be taken on record as Annexure P-5. CRM-1603-2026 This application has been filed for preponing of the main case which has been fixed for 03.02.2026.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is ordered to be taken on Board today itself. Main case:

1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of the order dated

17.11.2025 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, whereby the bail order of the petitioner has been cancelled and bail bonds and surety bonds have been forfeited to the State and petitioner has been summoned through non-bailable warrants of arrest and without following proper procedure as established by law under Section 75(1) and Section 491 of BNSS, 2023 in FIR No. 127 dated 23.07.2023 under Sections 323, 506, 148, 149 of IPC, 1860 (offence under Sections 308, 325, 120-B, 201 of IPC, 1860 added later on) registered at Police Station Makhu District Ferozepur, Punjab. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before the learned Trial Court on 17.11.2025, as he could not return in time from the State of Madhya Pradesh, where he had gone for harvesting crops. Consequently, the learned Trial Court cancelled the bail orders of the petitioner and bail bonds and surety bonds of the petitioner were ordered to be forfeited to the State and issued non-bailable warrants. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the learned Trial Court to participate in the proceedings, therefore prays that the impugned order dated 17.11.2025 be set aside.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order

17.11.2025 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Ferozepur. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 07 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the application within a period of three days. 7.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 20.01.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No