Rd Food Products v. State Of Haryana And Others

Sr. No.273 E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB IN THE B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-38 8158-2025 f Decision : 08.04.2026 Date of D PRODUCTS

Versus

RYANA AND OTHERS M/S R.D. FOOD ...PETITIONER STATE OF HAR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM : H HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPA AK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA A BANERJI Present :

M M M Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mohit Bassi, Advocate for the with e petitioner.

Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. A.G., Har ryana.

DEEPAK SIB *** BAL, J. (Oral) earned counsel for the parties ar re ad idem that the issue raised L through this p petition is squarely covered in t the petitioner's favour by the judgment of a a Division Bench of this Court dated 10.12.2024, passed in CWP-18967-2 2020-Tecnimont SPA India P Project Office Vs. State of Punjab and a nother.

In n the light of the above cons sensus, this petition is also disposed of, in n terms of the judgment in Te cnimont SPA India Project Office (supra) ).

(DEEPA J AK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPIT J TA BANERJI) 08.04.2026 Prince Whether speak Whether repor JUDGE king/reasoned :

Yes/No rtable :

Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2026.04.09 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document