Manpreet Kaur v. State Of Haryana

 
   
  

 

 

  !"#"$% &' '(  ) '''''   *#' +  '''''+  
% ,-'+
+.


   



    



+.  /'

    !   

  "#$ %  &' (

(

  )*)$ ( '

' ' !

 ! '

+,- & *)**  * *.

)*)/ 

 *012 $/1$2 %&    

  3)1)2 )$# %&  )*)$ '


 

   &'

  4!

)

  !     )0 *3 )*)/ 4


 ( 5  4  !   '

  4

 ! */**
 ! 4

  (5  ! 4 ( !  !  '

   4  !



 ( (  5    4  

  (  

 (    4 5

  5 4  '

 '

 (   !

Thus, the request was made to take legal action against the accused. On the basis of the

 same, the FIR was registered. On registration of the FIR, the investigation commenced. The petitioner was arrested on 09.07.2025. The petitioner approached the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala praying for the grant of bail. However, after hearing both the sides and finding no merit in the same, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner vide order dated 27.10.2025.Hence being aggrieved, the petitioner is before this Court praying for the grant of regular bail by way of filing the present petition.

$

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has submits that as is evident from the case of the prosecution the allegations of causing injuries to the complainant are against the co-accused-Sahil. She submits that neither the petitioner was named in the FIR nor any role has been attributed to her, however, she has been impleaded in the present case on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, namely Sahil, which in itself is not even an admissible evidence. She has further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and she is behind bars for last more than 10 months. She has submitted that in the facts and circumstances, the petitioner deserves to be granted regular bail.

"

  

   !4  4 !  !4 

   !

5    ! 6 ! 

  

7 

!4   -   5  4 

9

 4

,

0 % 

'  !4  :4  

 !  5   :4  

4 '

       

/

  '

    '



,

  neither  was named in the FIR nor any role has been attributed to her, however, she has been arrayed as an accused on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused. The petitioner has been alleged to be conspirator of the offence.        

  * 4 #    .

*/ )*)3

,      

8 54 '   '  '

7   !  !

  ' 5 !             !  ! !   !   8

.

    (   '

4

 ( '

 5   4  8

    

4( '

  ' ' !

 '  

5

 !   !     '

! ; !       8;

 '



& '

    !    :     4  

1+.2

 */ )*)3  <

( ';

=;& < -!

=;&