Sanju v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-72409-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.02.2026 Sanju ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :
Mr. Anoop Singla, Advocate for the petitioner
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.
!"
# $%&"'() (*( * + ''*'(*''+, -!"
,)', -!"
- .%.
/ ' * + 0 12 3Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, even otherwise the allegations against him are of being a part of the unlawfull assembly, while injury being allegedly inflicted to brother of the complainant-Shiva is attributed to co-accused Vishal. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Rohit has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2025, Annexure P-3. He is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion.
At the asking of the Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 05.01.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) BNSS.
MOHIT 2026.02.11 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-72409-2025 (O&M) -2However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.
Adjourned to 11.02.2026.4 5 6 7 27
# 8 #
8 #9 7 8
#: 7; 7 8
7
6 7 %<
7 7 8 #
8 #9 7 : + %8 8 = # 7 # #
' * + 7 7 #7 7 , -!"
) 987
8 # :
#78 # 7 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 11.02.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes / No Whether reportable :
Yes / No MOHIT 2026.02.11 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document