Jagdeep Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab

2.

On 24.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "

ready and willing t when required by the i cooperate.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of th DAG, Punjab, accepts no State.

Meanwhile, the pe to join the investigation as and investigating agency and will he Court, Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, otice on behalf of respondentetitioners are directed to join PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.23 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

the investigation on or before 31.12.2025. In the event of their arrest, they shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioners do not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 23.02.2026."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur. 4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Nirmal Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners are allowed and the order dated 24.12.2025 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.02.23 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.