Khursheed Alias Kurasid v. State Of Haryana

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH


Decided on: 13.02.2026
  

......Petitioner
Versus


   .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:


  

 


  
****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)




  


   
 




 
! "
 "
 
# $
%&%
" !
!

!


 


 !
'()
*

&+&+%&%
 
 

*,-
# 
,+
%&
(./
 0&




$
! 

. 
 

12
3  
' 

4

%

5
 


  
 


  
1
!
 

6 


 
/ 



1
!


 !


 
/ 


 

6
& 
 

%*& %&%+



6
 
  6

 




 

  

76 



1
6
 

6
1
 

 
 
 8
 
 
1
 



9
%0%&%+

  
 6
  


 
/ 

 :


 

-2-
 
  
1
6 
 
 

&+%%&%+





 
 
;

!
'  <

  



  



6

&%
6


 



!

 

!


 

 

6 

+

)6 
 !
/ 
=
4
1



/ 

 



 -
 

 

!


 


  

 6 


 

 !



7




!








6 
0
4 
7.

 !

 1



  6






 




 


  <

  
1
!


 !


 
/ 

7 6
&
  
%*& %&%+




 
  6
 



%*& %&%+<
76 
  



6 


 
/ <
 
1 
" sufficient time to conclude and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in custody for any further period, as concession of bail cannot be denied just as a measure of punishment as culpability is to be decided by trial Court after appreciating evidence adduced by the parties, and it is a trite principle of criminal jurisprudence that bail is rule, jail is an exception,

-3-
this Court deems it a fit case

!

 

! 
 


  

8.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned and by imposing such conditions so as to secure the presence of the petitioner during the trial proceedings. 9.

Nothing observed herein shall be construed as an opinion on the merits of the main case.

(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
13.02.2026
Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:

YES/NO