← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/73473/2025allowed

Sudesh And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2026-04-07Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary2 pages

On 30.03.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- "

ready and willing to join the required by the investigating investigation as and when agency and will cooperate.

Adjourned to 07.04.2026 Meanwhile, the petition investigation on or before 02 arrest, they shall be relea satisfaction of the Arresting O 6.

ners are directed to join the 2.04.2026. In the event of their ased on interim bail to the Officer, subject to compliance PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.08 19:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

of conditions as enshrined under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

However, it is clarified that if the petitioners do not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioners have not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioners to appear, they shall make themselves available without demur. 4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from the Investigati9ng Officer, affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. She also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation.

5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 30.03.2026 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them.

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.04.08 19:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.