Sunil Kumar v. Devender Dahiya, Engineer In Chief, Pwd (B&R), Haryana And Another

COCP No.6400 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.6400 of 2025 Date of decision: January 30th, 2026 Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner

Versus

Devender Dahiya and another .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Present:

Mr. Hitesh Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Aryavart Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 29.01.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:

"Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the petitioner, after receiving an amount of ₹11,63,570/-, has stated on 21.01.2026 that nothing further is due to him. The certificate of payment duly signed by the petitioner has been handed over to the Court, which is taken on record as Mark 'A'. It is submitted that thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

There is a written request for adjournment by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground of personal difficulty.

Adjourned to 30.01.2026.

To be shown in the urgent list.

January 29th, 2026"

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.01.30 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP No.6400 of 2025 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of and in case any cause survives, petitioner be granted liberty to revive the present petition. 3.

Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

January 30th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.01.30 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh