Arbina And Another v. State Of U.T Chandigarh And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-14152-2025 Date of decision: 01.01.2026 ARBINA AND ANOTHER .... PETITIONERS VS STATE OF UT, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS .... RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Ms. Hasan Kaur, Advocate (through V.C.) for Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Balram Singh, Addl. PP for UT, Chandigarh.

***** Sandeep Moudgil, J.(Oral) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents no. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has produced the original statement of petitioner No.1 in Court today, which is taken on record. As per the statement, petitioner No.1 has no threat perception from her family members or in-laws.

In the light of above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition.

Prayer is accepted.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

01.01.2026 (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No SONIA BURA 2026.01.01 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document