Anil Majumdar v. State Of Tripura And 4 ORS

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFTRIPURA AGARTALA R.S.A.No.61of2009 ShriAnilMajumder,
   

      

  

 !
 
"
#$ ............Appellant -Versus- 1.
TheStateofTripura,  $
 %   %& &

  $   '

 (!    #$

 2.
TheDirectorofSchoolEducation, (!  #$

 3.
TheHeadMaster, )

 # 

  

 
 "
 #$ 4.
TheChairman, * 

  +    %  ,-.-//0 5.
TheBranchManager,  ,
  &$% 1





  *  "
 #$ ............Respondents BEFORE THEHON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.TALAPATRA 2 $$  :   %

!  

%

!   2 
:  
3
   ( 

        

3

!
    ! % :10.04.2015 )

 45 "

 $ : YES NO √

 JUDGMENT&ORDER(ORAL) +        & %   
 
 


  % 

 & %    
 !      *%    
 $$      $$  
 3  
  


3
  
$$    6 ( 

   
$$   
 07 4 8       

3    
 $$     
$  [2] # 
 
  $$      0//    &

   
 /77//: 
 #  $$  /77//:
3 
 


 7-   #  $$   /7  7//: %




  $$  
 
;        7- $


 /77//:

 [3]

    
$$ % 0/ 7/07   3 

 ;

  3 3    < (i) Whether the earlier possession of the vendor of the appellant is required to be taken into accountwhilecalculatingthelengthofpossession in favour of the successive possessor in determining the adverse possession of the subsequentpossessor? (ii) Whether the starting date of possession is necessary to be pleaded and proved in a case where adverse possession is found to be established for a period more than the statutory period? (iii)WhethertheCourtbelowcommittederrorby refusingtoacceptthegroundthatthedelaywas





 caused due to fault on the part of the engaged counsel? [4] # 
& 
  

;
 8
  
  
   
          

 
 

   %67 %
$   $$   
 

   
$ ! % /7 7//: 7//: #  7/7//9% &!)

 )  !
"
#$ [5] #     
     $$   
 

      $



   $ $          &! )

 )  !
  "
#$ #   
 
 07 8   
 
 %   3 
      $ 
   +3 ! % 

  /7 7//:
3
 


 [7]



 !

%
 

 

7//: $$ $
 $$   :-

 $$  %   6    1  
    3
 %  67 %
  $
 
 $$ 3  
  
  
#  $$   /7  7//:

 ,  
  $$     %  
  /7  7//:   

 

3 %   $$  
 %
 3   3

   


  % 
 *%


% 
     
=
  





 >$ 3
  !      
  


 



  3
 
         $%    

      $ $   $$  $$   % '!  % $$ 5 ?1,* 7@

 $$  % 7-   
  /7  7//:   
 $$   



!

 % 
 

% >$  3  %

3
 
     $$$  

 % 
 , 
  

!

3 % $$       
    $$  
    >$

 2%  
!   
 
$%  %   $$      
 
 
 $%   %3
      $       
    $ >   Collector, Land Acquisition Anantanag and another vs. Mst. Katijiandothers $ AIR1987SC1353.,
3 3   
 $ > 

!

     %$ $$ 
   $ %  
 ! 
 

!  
 
  [8] 5
% $ 7//:


 
 
$    
 $$    
 
!

 
  <





 Inthepresentcase,thegroundsforcondonation of delay put forward are the sad demise of the fatheroftheLd.Advocate,Mr.K.Royandalsohis illness. The said demise of the father of the Ld. Advocate might be true. But in respect of illness no medical certificate, prescriptions have been displayedtosubstantiatethegroundsofillness. [9] ,  
 $ 
$ !    
       

% 
&
 
  $  
$$   

 !   %67 %
$
 $$   % $ 
 /77//:
   



# %67

%
  $
  $$   
   

     
$ ! % /7 7//: 07 #   7/  7//: %   &! )

 )  !
  "
 #$ 
  %  

 &
; %    7- #  $$  /77//:


 ;

 # 
 & 3    % 
!    

;

3
 
& 
  % $$  #  $$  /77//:    % 
 $$  

 % 
$$ 
3



 $    %   3 1&*
     JUDGE