Ajijun Nur And ORS v. Firoja Begam And ORS

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFTRIPURA
AGARTALA   RSANo.05of2009& RSANo.06of2009    RSANo.05of2009   Appellants: 1.
AjijunNur,










  2.
SmtiSabjanBibi,
 


 

3.
Md.MohmudulHasan,
 


 


 4.
Smt.KhaledaBegam,  


 

 5.
Md.MahbuburRahaman,



 


 




 



    

 
 

 
 !"
#

   

$ 
%


& '

( 
)  *
%

  ByAdvocate: 









&
)
$*

 -Versus-  Respondents:  1. Smt.FirujaBegam,   

*
+
 





 
   

'
& '
( 
)  *
#

 


2.
Smt.SamsunNahar,  




3. Smt. Ruksana Begam,
 



 4. Smt.SokinaBegam,









 



 5. AsadurRahaman,











 6. MujiburRahman,











 #
  
 !

,

   

$ 
(-
& '

( 
)  *
%

 
 ByAdvocate: 
) (
.


$*
 RSANo.06of2009  Appellants: 1.
AjijunNur,





















  2.
SmtiSabjanBibi,







 


 

3.
Md.MohmudulHasan,










 


 4.
Smt.KhaledaBegam,  


 

 5.
Md.MahbuburRahaman,












 


 




 



    

 
 

 
 !"
#

   


%


& '

( 
)  *
%

 



 ByAdvocate: 









&
)
$*

 -Versus- Respondents:  1. Smt.FirujaBegam,   

*
+
 


 
   

'
& '
( 
)  *
/

 


2.
Smt.SamsunNahar,  



 

3. Smt. Ruksana Begam,
 



 
4. Smt.SokinaBegam,









 



 
5. AsadurRahaman,











 
6. MujiburRahman,











 
#
  
 !

,

   

$ 
(-
& '

( 
)  *
%

 
 ByAdvocate: 
) (
.


$*
BEFORE THEHON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.TALAPATRA



)

  


:!!

!01

)

  $ 




:08.05.2015
2 
3
4 




 5  
 

  
: Yes No  √     



 JUDGMENT&ORDER 
 

 
 
+'



!006

+'

 0,

!006
  


*
 

 *
 
!, 0, !007
  $  

 
 
 08

!007

 
 
 0,

!007



)  *
2 

 
( 

  

*

 

 *
 
!0 1!

!009
 


:


2 
2
) 
( 

 

 
' 



!00,

 $  

 

 *
 
!0 !009
 

 
' 


;: 
: <

!00,

 
 
*


 
 

 * 


 
 
80

;=>

<


 
 
!

166,
;=>

<


  
 


 
16 166,
;=> ,<

$ 

  

* 
* 

 *  $ 
 

 
  

 

 
  

 


*
 





[2]


 



 
  
 
' * 
100


:

& :



 

  

 

 * 


 
 

  



*  

  

* ?  
  

  
* 

  *


 


 *  


* 
  













 [3]
5 
  

 
 
:


 
 
08

006
 

 
 
?  


 

 
 /

RSANo.05of2009 (i) Whether the finding of the learned appellatecourtinconcurrencewiththatofthe learned trial court that the certified copy of the power of attorney was inadmissible in evidenceinthefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,isinaccordancewithlaw?  (ii) Whether the finding of the learned appellatecourtinconcurrencewiththatofthe learned trial court that the title deeds of the appellants herein were baseless and imaginaryistenableinlaw?  (iii) Whether the finding of the learned appellate court in concurrence with that the learnedtrialcourtwhichbaseditsfindingson the admissible enquiry report in the revenue case No.

REV/REVISION/ 36 that the appellants herein had no right, title and interest over the suit lane is in accordance withlaw?AND  (iv)Othersubstantialquestionsoflawwhich maybepertinentforeffectivedecisionofthe SecondAppeal.  RSANo.06of2009 (i) Whether the declaration of the leaned appellate court that the registered sale deed 30.05.1974(Exbt.4)beingvoidabinitioasin accordancewithlaw?  (ii) Whether the finding of the learned first appellatecourtbelowthattheregisteredsale deed dated 30.05.1974(Exbt.4) was not proved merely because the vendee of the deedwasnotexaminedisinaccordancewith law?  (iii) Whether the finding of the leaned appellate court that the registered sale deed dated 30.05.1974(Exbt.

4) was void as based noonevidence?  (iv) Whether the finding of the learned appellatecourtinconcurrencewiththatofthe learned trial court that the certified copy of the power of attorney was inadmissible in evidenceinthefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,isinaccordancewithlaw?



  (v) Whether the impugned decree is vitiated because of consideration of inadmissible and irrelevantevidence(Exbt.ID)?AND   (vi)Othersubstantialquestionsoflawwhich maybepertinentforeffectivedecisionofthe secondappeal.   [4]

=$ 


 
 
 $ 
  

 
 
 
?  


 *

 
   

 * $
 * 


 

&
)
  
* 
  


 


  

  
 
?  


 



*


  
4
*  

 

 * 


 
?

  

 * 
 

 
 
 
  /


(i) Whether the declaration of the appellate court that the registered sale deed dated 30.05.1974 (Exbt.4) being void
  is in accordancewithlaw?  (ii)Whetherthefindingoftheappellatecourt that the certified copy of the power of attorney is inadmissible in evidence is in accordancewithlaw?  (iii) Whether consideration of enquiry report submitted in the revenue case No.REV/REVISION/36/96 (Exbt.D) has vitiated the impugned judgment for its being inadmissibleandirrelevant? [5] 
*
  

 *  

 
?  



 ?

  
' 
+ 
)

80



    
 
 



  
  $ 

  

 

  



  
 
   *

( 




> * 

 


 
16 166,
  

*  


  



.
)

 


  *


 

4

 


 
 

 


  


> * 

    

 
 A# !!
 
!

166,

$


 
B 


 *$ 



 

 
 
!

166,


 *

 



  

 

 *  


 *  


 
 
!

166,
 

 



  



 * 

 *  * 
 



    
.

 
 
  


 
    


A

   

 
*

-

80

166,


  
 1

 
 *
 *  

    


 
 
  
 1;<

1;<
  

 $ 
   
 
' * 
6


B+
3
B+
*
 

: *

 
( 
 
 +=CD+=CA'A4D8,D6,

*  

$  



 
 
80

 


 

 
A



 


  
  
 1




'
 

  
 


 

A

 
*  


 $ 
*  

'
 
 
   
 $ 
  

 


$



  


.




  @
*



  
  
 1
 

  

 


 


10 166,



  
  * 

 
 
*

** 

  
 !
3
8

* 

  
  


 @
 
*




*


  


 





!

166,
 

    

 

> * 

 
$



  





  




  

 
 

  
 
 
  

 
  

 

  
 1!
3
8

  

  
  


  

* 


 

  

* 
* 
 

**  


    

 
 A#89

 




 * 


 


 
16 166,
> * 



  



$



  



$ 

 

  
  

 
  
  

* 
* 


 


  
 

  

'
 

 
 $ 
  

  
 1

 
   
 

'
 

  
 1

>* $ 
 

  

 


 *
  

  
 
 
 

'




 

 


  


  

* 

 


'


** 


  
 1!
3
8


  







    

. 


 $ 
 

A 


  




 
 



 



  



* 
 

 

 



?  

 

 *

 ? 
 


 


 
* 

$


 

 

$ 
'

*

  




  
 


$ 
 


 
 A#89

 
80


 


**  


 ? 
 


 




 
 A# !!
 
!

166,

 

 * 
**  


 
=$ 

 


 
16 166,

 * 
**  

  $

 

* $
* 

[6] 
  

 

** 

  * 


 


* 
* 



7;

<
 
 
 


 
*
 *
* 

 *
  

  * 


*  
 
?  



* 


 
:




 [7]
.

*
 
 
!0 1!

!009

 
*

 *  


$  *
 


 

 
/
;

<

 


;=> ,<


 *
 *

 

$ 

' * 
,


=$  *

*

  

*

  





   *
=$ 


 *

 $ 
 
' * 
,,


=$  *
*



  



* 


  
 


  
 



 
 
1667

* 


 
 

-

 

 
*
* 
'*
 

* 

 


 
*

!6

E   

08 1667


  


 
;  * 


 
 
11 1667


 <

* 

 






$  *


* ? *




 
 
!

166,
;=>

<

 * 

*  




 
*
*


** 


 
  

$
 
 
$ 

 

;

<
5 
 *  


?  
  

 
 


 

 
* $

 

 
  

 
 * /

Inquiry report i.e. Ext. D speaks that once said Bhabatosh Das appeared before the authoritypretendinghimselfasSatyaRanjan Dasformutation.EvenasperExt.CandExt.D physical existence of Sri Satya Ranjan Das is not proved. Mere registration of a document does not mean that the same shall be considered and unimpeachable piece of evidence.Ext.CalsoshowsthatTitleIdeedsof the plaintiff reflects the plot numbers and area of land belongs to one Hatim Ali. Above all, Ext.E shows that suit land is still lying againstthenameofSuabAliasperrecordof settlement. So, under this circumstances this courtisoffirmopinionthattheTitledeedsof theplaintiffsarebaselessandimaginaryone.





[Emphasissupplied]



 ;

<
$ 
  

$  *
 


 

 
*

 $ 


 
 1
 


 

  


 






 

*






 

  

 
4

 


 
  

 
  

 



 *


*  
 
' * 
1



: & :


 
  
 

'#
) 
  
( 


 

  


 


4 :


( 
& *
' 
 
 *
 
' * 
1



: & :

** 


 
*


$  *

&5#1


 


 
   
4

 


   


  
;)#!
3
8<
  


 


 
$*


 
*

 $ 

 *

 
  

 
 
  



  

$

 * 
*  
 
  
$ 

 

 




  


 

  


 


A
 

$ 

  
 
 
80


!

166,
 

* 


* 
*

 $ 

  



 
 
;=> 8<



 
 
!

166,;=>

<

* 


 

 
*
 $ 


 

*  




 ?   
 
 

* 


* 
* 

*
*

-
 *


* 


 

 
*   
* 
;=> (
3
.<

;

$<


 
*

  

* 
*  



*
 -
  
 
* 

* 
 

*

 

  
* ** 

  
** 


 
*

* 


  
 

*  

  


 
 

)  *
: *

   
  

* 
*

** 


 
*


*

 

 

*  



  
    
-
 



 *

 *



* 



* 
* 

 
  

  
*

 


* 
*

[8] 
  
  

 
 

 

 

 

 
* 
* 

*


)  *
2 

 
( 
 
 
 
 08

!007
  

 
  

 
 
 

 
 

 *
 
!, 0, !007
  $  

 '


!00,

 


 

    

 
 
 0,

!007

 
 
+'

 0,

!006
   


 

  * 
 


 
 

 *
 
!, 0, !007
  $  




  
 
 0,

!007
;  

 
 



!00,
   

 
' 


0

166,<
  

 
 
 
 


!007
  

 

 *
 
!, 0, !007
  $  

 
 
 08

!007
  

 
' 
;: 
: <


!00,



 [9] 
&
)
  
* 
  


 

  

 

  

 *

    

 
 
80

;=>

<

 
 * 
$ 


A
 


 


'



  
*  *


  
 1!
3
8

$
 
  


 
 

;=>

<
  
> * 

'
 
$ 

 

 

$
 
 



  




*  F 


 
* 
 
. 


  $
 

 



 $ 
*

A 

( 

*

 


'


.
 

  


$
 
* 


* 
* 

 *

 

4 
CA
+



:

& :

 *
$  



* 

 *


  
  


    

 *


 
 


 * 
 *





 *  




$  
 
4 
CA
+


:

& :


 
 

  

 

* 


  

 *
>* 

' 
+ 
)
 $ 
 
( 
$
 
 

 
  



  $ 
$
 

'

 $ 





 
 
!

166,

*  
 
  




  


 

 
* 

 

 


 
16 166, =$ 

  
*


  
 




* 
 

 
*


*   
*

 


 *
A

  
*


  
 1




 
 

'





 * 

  
'

  

 




  







 *  



 *


  
 1

*  




 *
  




>* $
 

 


 

 
 $ 
 $ 
 

* 

 




 
 

'


 [10] 
) (
.


  
* 
  


  

  




 


   

&5#8
( 
)



?   

 
 
!

166,





 


*





 



 


-




 
  


 







 


  
 


> * 

' 
+ 
)

* 
 
 


 

  


 




  
 

 


 
16 166,

  

 




* 
 




  '#+  
( 


   


 
 
80


  


. 
)

   

 
  

 
 

   

  

. 
)
A

*# >  


  

 
- 
 

  
 

 



  

  



.
)


  







 
  
. 
)


 * 

 
  

**  


)  *
+  
;) 
3
: *<
 
- 


? 

  *

  

    
 
;=>

<

 
 




 
 
' 
+ 
)

   


.


  
* 

  




  


*


 *

 * 

 $ 
 
 


 
 
*


* 
* 
 

 



  

[11]  
:

* 
 



 
 
!

166,
;=>

<
*

  


 

 


 

*



 
  


 


 *  



  



 
 
!

166,
 


 

 

$ 

 



 


 

 


  

  *



    
 

 ?* 

 *  * 
 

   

* * 



 



    
=>  *


' 
+ 
)


 
$ 
=$ 
 


*


 $ 

 

 
*  

 $ 





  





  




  



  
$ 

 



 
' 
+ 
)
  

 
=$ 
 
   



  



 

*

  
 

  $ 

*   
*

* 
 *


*


 


*
 

 

 



  

' 
+ 
)
' 
+ 
)

-

 

$   

*
 



 


 

*



' 
+ 
) 
*


*

* 


  

&5#8
 
:


  
 

 * 



 
 
*



 
 
!

166,
;=>

<


 

  
 


 
16 166,
;=> ,<

*



 * 
$ 

 
.


 

  
 

-

 

$



 
 
80

;=>

<


> * 

'


  
 

 

'

 

> *

 

 

'

 

 



  


 

 


 

  

 
 

 

$ 

 


 * 

   
 
'

*

 # 
$



   

$
 
 
$ 

 


 




  
*



*

 

 
  


 
$
  

$
 
  
$ 

 


 


* 
 

 
   * 

 

  
 *


   *


  *


 * 


 *


 
 
80

;=>

<

$ 


 

)

 *
** 

' 


 *
   


       JUDGE