Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd. v. Billal Miah And 2 ORS.

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFTRIPURA AGARTALA CRPNo.89of2013 TheOrientalInsuranceCompanyLtd.,








 


 



 

 !
"#!

$

 
%


&'

( ')*)
" !+,,

............

Petitioner -Versus- 1.
ShriBillalMiah, 

$
-!
 $
 

.

 /$
 
0+ 

0+ 
1 !
!$
 !
2
34

 
2.
**** (a)
ShriBidhuBhushanDas, 


( 

$! 



 
 

.

 !$
% 

5
 
$4
%$
 !

 
#%
67789&
(b) ShriMihirLalDas, 

$
( $!
($!$

 

.

 !$
% 

5
 

$4
%$
 !

 
#% 67789&
(c) SmtiJyotsnaDas, 

$
 
:

 

.



!$
% 

5
 

$4
%$
 !

 
#% 67789&
(d) ShriBikramDas(minor), 

$
 
:

 

.

 !$
% 

5
 



$4
%$
 !

 
#% 67789&
(e) ShriBijitDas(minor), 

$
 
:

 

.

 !$
% 

5
 

$4
%$
 !

 
#% 67789&
(f) ShriManikLalDas, 


( 

$! 



 
 

.

 !$
% 

5
 
$4
%$
 !

 
#%
67789&
3.
ShriPradipSarkar, 

4
+
 

( 
 
$4

  %$
 !
"






 %


&'

( ')*)
!+,
**** As per order dated 03.05.2014 passed in CM. Appl. No.37 of 2014, the legal heirs of the respondent No.2 have beensubstituted. ............Respondents BEFORE THEHON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.TALAPATRA -
$
 


:







3!4
 


-
$


:







!+ $
 



$ 




:




28.05.2015 
;!4





$$
 

 : YES NO √ JUDGMENT&ORDER(ORAL) <


3!4

!
 

$
 

2



!+ $

!
 
$

%
8",

8",
$

$ 

$

2

$

 
  
%


&'

( ')*)

 



 " !+,
%


$
$

2$
$
 $

+
!

$ 

[2]


 
 
!
 
886

$
 ! 

# 
=!  
$


$


'7&)8&'>







 "

2,
&9

8&''

$

 
 4
 !
!$
 !
1 !
2
34 ;! 

 
$


2
 
 
!

?:.##
!
'

$

 



 "

2,
&9

8&''

=! 
$
/!4

2

'8''8&'&




 ",
%8&&

8&'&
 
$
$

$
$
 
$
 
#!
4
2


2
  

4
$
4

$
  

%8
2$
2
$
2

$
4

 

$
 
4!$

$
$


!
 

$
 


$


$
 


8'&*8&&*
 

$4
$
!

2


$4
289&*8&&*





 
8)&*8&&7

$
 
$
+


8'&*8&&*

 

$
 
 
$

%8
$
2

$
 
!

$ 
/ 
4 

[3]
<




$
/!4

2

'8''8&'&


3!4

!
 

$
 
$
 
!
$
$
!

$



$




@ 

!
2 $!
 
$
 
@ 



 

 

2$ $
2

 

 






$



$
  

4+ 
 4

$
2
2
 @

$
 



2




$


$

$
 

$
 
!

?:.##
!
'

$

+ 


2

$


$
/!4
!

$
4!


'7&)8&'>
$
 


2
 
2
 4 
$ 



$A

"Toconsiderthereviewpetition,thepetitioneris to prove that after due diligence some documents could not be filed. Photocopy of insurance policy was considered while passing the judgment. In paragraph 11 of the judgment it is reflected that the vehicle was insured with the Oriental Insurance company Ltd. Such findingcannotberecalled.Whileconsideringthe review petition, nothing new discovered in the review petition. As per judgment earlier it is clearly affirmed that the offending vehicle was coveredwiththeinsurancepolicy.So,thiscourt while considering the submission of learned counsel, cannot recall the order passed earlier. Thisreviewpetition,therefore,hasnomerit".  [4]


3!4

!
 

$
 
$


$
!

$ 
! 4  

$
 

$

$ 

$

%8

  
$
 



2$
$
 


$
/!4

'>&'8&''




 ",
9'>

8&&*
2$ $
$
 
!

$
4
 
 


$
4
 

$
 


$
!

!
%
>88)&BC>'C8&&7C')6*
$ 

!$


4


$



3!4

!
$
! 4 
$
4  
$
4
2
 


+
$



4
$ 


$
 
$
! =!

 



 
 

<
$
!$

$
$
!
 $
$

!$


!

$
2

$





+
!4

!
!$
 
$
$



44!  

8'''8&')


$
 / 

$
 
 
$
 
 
!

?:#
!
86

$


$

%
8",

8",
#
$
 
44!  
$


$A
"Now we have received a reply from our Divisional Office, Shillong, the controlling Division of our Shilong Branch (policy issuing office) vide their male dated 18.11.2014 confirming that they had only issued policy No. 322406/31/2009/1487 having the policy period from 25.08.2008 to 24.08.2009 and not the policy having the policy period from 15.08.2008 from14.08.2009whichintheiropinionisafake one. A copy of our Shillong Office mail dt.18.11.

2014alongwithacopyoftheirpremium collection report/register for the period from 15.08.2008 to 25.08.2008 is enclosed for your perusal." [Emphasisadded] $
44! 

8'''8&')
$

2 


3!4

!
 

$
 

[5] 
!  
$

$ 
!
$
!  D
$
4 !4
 
2$ $


 

$
 
!4


2 $
$
 / 



@! 8

$
 


$
!4


3!4

!
$
! 4 
$


!
$

@ 

$

%8

! 
$
!


@! (

$
 
!

?:#
!
86

$

#
!

$  

3!4

!

 



 $
@
!

UnitedIndiaInsuranceCo.Ltd.vs.Rajendra Singh and others


2000 SCC (Cri) 726
2$
$
@
!
$
  
$A
3.'Fraudandjusticeneverdwelltogether(
    

  )isapristinemaxim which has never lost its temper over all these centuries. Lord Denning observed in a language without equivocation that 'no judgment of a court, no order of a Minister can be allowed to standifithasbeenobtainedbyfraud,for,fraud unravels everything" (        ). [6] <



 

$
 
  

 

$
@
!

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. RajendraSinghandothers


3!4

!
$

$ 
! 4  

4+ 

4
$
 
$
!
$

! 

$



$
$
4!


$
/!4

2


$
 !


$
[7] 
  
!$
! 4  



3!4

!


!+ $

!
$
! 4 
$
$


!

$



$ 
!

 
2 $
 !
2$
!
$
!
 


2$
 
-4
$
!

2$ $
$

!$


!


 




@! (

$
 
 

  
%7)

8&')


$
$


 
$
!$
  
 ! 
$ 
4
$ 
!






 
$
$

%8
$

2

$
 
$

$


 



 @ 

!

$


!+ 

!
$


$
/!4

2

'>&'8&''
@! 

$
 
 

 
 



!

?:#
!
86

$


 

  
%
7)

8&')
 
4
$ 
 

! 4 
$

$

$

!
4 
$
 
$ 
$

$
$
 

$
 !
  $
  

 4

$
4 
2 $
$4
-!$
$
$
 
!
$
4

)'

$
 
/!4

2





 ",
%9'>

8&&*

2!


$

4  $
!
 
@ 
(

$
 
 

  %
7)

8&'8
2

$



$
 

4+ 
!$
4  

$
 
 
2$$

2
=! $


$




[8] 
!
 
$

2!




$ 
!

 
$
!

$
!




4
$
 

$$
$

2$ $
$





4
'9&*8&&*

')&*8&&7
$

!

$
 

$

$
$





4
89&*8&&*





 
8)&*8&&7

$
!




2
$


$
2
!

$
 

E
(!

 
  


$
4 


$ 
!
$ 
!


$
 

2
$
$ !

 !
4  
$
 !


  @ 
2$ 
 
$
/!4

2

'8''8&'&




 
",
8&

8&'&
$
44 


 



  !
 4!$

$
 !

$
 

 4
$
 


2$ $
2

 

$





$
$


/ 
$


2
  
! 

$
 !4

$
 
$
2
 

$


2
 
2



2
$
 
$
2
 

$
 

$
2$$
4
$
 

$

@ 



 
$
2$$
$
2
$
  

$


$


 

E
$
 
$
 

$
$

$
$

!
$4
$

 
4
89&*8&&*


2



 
8)&*8&&7
$!
 
$


$
4
2$ $
 

$
!

2
2 $ 
$
/!   
!

?:#
!
86

$

$
 !
$
44 
 
(!

$
4
 4

!+ 

!

=!



2$ 
$
$

$

4


@ 

$ 
!

4


 
2$$
$


2$ $
$

$2






4
'9&*8&&*
2
!

$
!
4




4

 
$

2

!

+


!$
-
$
!

$
=!

 
=!


$!
$ 
!


$
 
  
$
$
$
4!


'7&)8&'>

$
/!4

2

'8''8&'&

  



 

  
$


 

 
$
  

  

 4


$


 


$
$
!
$ 
!
2!






$
  
! 
$
4! 


 



 $
4 
<
$
 4
 
$

$

$

 
 4
 !
34
;! 

 
1 !

  
$
2 !

 
$
/!4

2
+ 
$
$
  

Whether the policy No. 322406/31/2009/1478 was alive from 15.08.2008 or was it alive from 25.08.2008? [9]
-
!

/!  
$
!
$
 
2 


 

 


!4

$
 !
! $
!4
!$



2

$
 !

?:#
!
86

$

 
 
  
7)

8&')
 
4
$ 
 
$
 
$


 

 

$
!4
$
$ 

 
2 $
$ 
 / 

  
%7)

8&')
$
2!


 

 

$
!4

!

$ 



 
$
 !

 

4
$
 
2 $ 

 

B" @,
4$
4
$


 

$

4
$ !
  
$ 
 

2

$
@


 
  


2
$
:
$2 $



JUDGE