← Library
High Court of TripuraCrl.Rev.P./107/2010allowed

Gopa Datta v. Bhaskar Gupta

2015-06-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Talapatra6 pages



 

       



wifeofShriBhaskarDatta, daughterofShriChittaranjanDatta, ofMilanChakra,AdarshaPalli, P.O.A.D.Nagar,P.S.WestAgartala, District-WestTripura  !!" # $ #%&%$ '#!('

%)



 sonofShriSitikantaDatta, ofKhilpara,Amtali,P.O.&P.S.R.K.Pur, Udaipur,District-SouthTripura  %"* " (

  +(, -    Forthepetitioner :None Fortherespondent :None Dateofhearing& :./0 deliveryofjudgment andorder Whetherfitforreporting: -

,1

 2 3 None appears for the parties, despite several YES NO √ opportunities are granted by this Court. Hence, this Court proceedsfordisposalonexaminationofrecords. 45 This petition under Section 397 read with Section 401oftheCr.P.Chasbeenfiledquestioningthejudgmentand orderdated27.07.2010deliveredincaseNo.Miscellaneous425

45 of2009bytheJudge,FamilyCourt,Agartala,WestTripuraby refusingmaintenancetothepetitioner. 4.5 The petitioner herein instituted a petition under Section 125 of theCr.P.C for maintenance for herself and for her minor daughter, in the court of the Judge, Family Court, Agartala,WestTripuraandthatpetitionwasregisteredascase No. Miscellaneous 425 of 2009. Initially, the Family court granted the interim maintenance for the petitioner and her minor daughter a sum of Rs.4,000/> (Rupees Four thousand) permonthbytheorderdated13.11.2009.Thepetitionerhas statedthatthepetitionerwasmercilesslytorturedonunlawful demand and failing to bear with such cruelty, she left the matrimonial home and took shelter in her parent's residence.

 Onceshewasalsohospitalizedforsometimes.Therespondent nevertookcareofherortheirchild.Allsuchallegationshave been squarely denied by the respondent by filing a written objection.Thereafter,theevidencewasledbythepartiesand bythejudgmentandorderdated27.07.2010,theFamilyCourt refused maintenance for the petitioner but granted maintenanceforherminordaughter. Beingaggrievedbythat judgmentandorder,thisrevisionpetitionunderSection19(4) of the Family Courts Act has been preferred.



4.5 6 " 7 # &8 %% %% "  '  9!* "7 % " # 7#*  !  #%  :  7#;% 8 78 # '

 '&<''  !!" # 88 < * < !"%'  '&%:

"*%!  #;##&# !"*  "*  *=#;

 %'  *!* " & #  %!"<8  =#*

< !"%' '&%:

"*##&# !"*  "* *=#; ='!8  <!9!"< ' # * %!!" % >? :& %'  78 #8; %  * '

  # . "'% %'  %'! *  < #

8"< =!' '  %!   #; "* % ; * ' #  % '&%:

"*

"* =!  '  ' #  '   !!" #  >?3 8% *!* " % ; ";'!"< :& '  *  "**=#; * :;' %!  #;

'&<' %'  %  * '

 '  !!" #  = %!%: '

9 * "*#&# *:;' '&%:

"*

"* ' # # 8 !9 %  8%  #% # '  * %!!" * % * :; '  >? '

 ' # &<' # "*' %!  #;&% *% ;

 < # % '&%:

"* "* =!  "* =' " '  %!   #; 88 < *8; %) * '!% =!  !  '  !!" #  =' ' # ' #  ' # <! *  7"%#&7 * '&%   '  # *= 88!"< &#%  ' " '  %!   #; = % :&% * "*' '

* %%&# ' <   # " * '&%  :& &8!  8; : !"< !"%&8 *  '  7   :

7)  '  '&%   ' #  ' #  !&# "  7  '  ;&"< # :#' #  '  !!" #  2 >?@3 %  * '

 ' #  = % *  "*  % 0 A? "* =' " '  % !* *  "* 7&8* " :  &8!88 * '  !!" #= %#&# *' %   !  ! =&8* :  9 #; # '  * %!!"* % *:;'  >%'

  #'  ##!

<  '  !!" #  % ; * # 9 #;% 88 #!*!"' '&% '  ' # ' %!  #;  !&# "*=!'!"'!%  #!*  %'  = % &"* " !" # % *  % ; ' #  "* %'  &% *  7   < # # B& "8; 9 " =!'& '   #!%%!" # )"=8 *<  '  '&%:

"* "*"'!%!%%& ' # = %*!%&  8%  #%'

=!'!" %  * ;% :' '  !!" #  "* '  %!   #; 7    '  '&%   '   ' #  '  !!" #   < # "* % # * 8!9!"< ' #  % '&%:

"* "* =!  #

:&  ;

#% "* *&#!"< '!%  #!*  "  &<' # = % :#"

 :& =' " !" 7&#%   8 ;!"< '  %!   #; %8  * '!% &<' # # ='!7' '  = % ';%!7 88;

%% &8 * :; '!% ' #?!"?8 = "* 8% :; '!% =!  ='!7' '

* <!9 " '!  <#  %'7)

"* ' #  #  : !"< !"%&8 *  '  '

*  7  :

7)  '  '&%   ' #  ' # 

!&# "*  #% )!"< 8<;

' '

* 7  :

7)  '  '&%   '!%  ' # 

!&# &#!"< '!%  #!*  '  !!" #  *!* " )  "; 7" 7 =!' '  '&%:

"*  :& "  * ; %'  8"< =!' ' # ' #7  ' '&% '  ' #'  %!   #;  !&# "*  '

 ! '   ' #  '  %!   #; '

* %'="



4@5 # B&!# * '%! 8!;  '  "* " #!8!"<  #'#=!"<% =  #"' :*; '  ' #  '  !!" #  :; '  !"# * &<' #  %'  % # * :&%!"< '  &<' #&7'!"<' 7'

# 7 #'  ' #

"* " '!% !%%&  ' #  = % B& ## 8 "* =!'!"  * ;%  '  !!" #  "* ' # ' #7  &#'

'&%  "*"'  = ;:

7) ' ;8*< * 7#!!"

87 %  < !"% ' %!  #; "*' # !8; : #% &A% @CD?  '    "* ' #  #  ' ;  < # "*#' 8 %@;

#% ' 

!!" #'

%: "% ;!"<!"' '&%  ' # # "% "*!"'  "! =' "'  %!  #;!8 * 7 % !"' 

!8;&#  !&# # < !"< ' # :

7)  %'  *!* " 9 " 7 #    "*  '  &# "* " E?

 #  #* # = %  %% * *!# 7!"< ' #  < :

7)  ' #  #!"!

8 '  :& !88 *  ' % !*#* #= %"78! *=!' "* 8% %' *!*"  8' '!<' ##& "*!" '   "!  %'  !8 * '  # % " 7 % 

< !"%' %!  #;&A%0#  #< !"<  !" "

"7  %0 A? # "' % !"< '

 '  %!   #; '

% : " #"!"< %.0 A? %@ A? # "'=!'& ";:

%!% 4'

%!%%&8! *5 4@5 Ithasbeenfurtherobservedthat: "' %!  #;!% =!8!"<8!9 =!' '  =!  #9!* * %'  < % :

7)  ' # #!"!

8'   !&# &#!"<'

#!"< ' 7 % '  !!" #78 #8;%  * '

 %'  7 "" < :

7)  '  '&%   ' # '&%:

"*  !&# "* ! '!% !% '  7 %   !"* " F&%!!7 !" " '   #  ' 

!!" #   7  :

7)  ' #  # " 8 '&%  "  7  '  !!" #   '

% =!'*# =" ' #% 8 # '  %7! ;  '  '&%:

"*=!'& ; # %"

:8 7 &%  "*%  ' 9! ='

%' !%" "!8 *< 

";  !" "

"7  # '  '&%:

"*  :& '  !"#* &<' #: !"<!""7 "%'&8*":  * #!9 *#< !"<  !" "

"7 # '   ' # "* 77#*!"<8;

    '  9! = '

 '  # ; #  *  :; '  !!" #  #< !"< %&! :8  !" "

"7 !%# F 7 * = 9 #  '  !"# * &<' # 8!9!"< =!' '   !!" #  %'&8* :  <!9 " %  !" "

"7 !88'  !!" ## &#"% ' #  #!"!

8 '  "* 77#*!"<8;

 '  %!  #;#!('

%)

 !%*!# 7 * <!9   !" "

"7  % A? #"'  '!% !"# &<' # 8!9!"< =!' ' 

!!" # 

"* '  !" "

"7 

88= "7  % A? #"'%'&8*: 



% "  '   !!" #  :; " ; #* # &"* # '  **# %% " * : 8= =!'!" ' ;  9 #; "<8!%'  8 "* # "' "* # % "*!"<' % !* &":;" ;#* # '  " ; #* # 7!%%!" ! "; !% 8%  :  :#" :;' %!  #;G 405 After scrutinizing the records of evidence by this Court,twoquestionssurfacedinthiscasearethat: 2!3 >' ' # '   !!" # '

* 8  '  #!"!

8 '  =!'&

"; %&!7! " &% #"H"*  2!!3 >' ' # '  # %"* " '

% # &% *  !" !"' ##"H  4/5 The Family Court has laid much emphasis on the subsequentdecreeofrestitutionofconjugalrights,butthetrial courthasnotanalyzedorgivenanyreasonwhenthepetitioner leftthematrimonialhomewhethershewascompelledbythe circumstances to leave matrimonial home or not. A decree of restitution of conjugal rights by itself cannot operate against thepetitioner.Thereisnodisputeatallthattherespondentdid not provide any maintenance to the petitioner. Even though thisCourtdoes notapprovetheconductof thepetitionerbut consideringthecircumstancesunderwhichshewascompelled toleavethematrimonialhomeisoftheviewthatsheisalso entitled to get maintenance.

 It is to be observed that an  judgmentof restitutionofconjugalrightscannotperse purge the evidence led in the maintenance proceeding. Such judgmentshallprofferconsequentialcause.Itappearsthatthe petitionerdidnotplaceanyevidenceonrecordasregardsthe income of the respondent.



4/5 opinionthatthepetitionerisentitledtogetmaintenance,the respondentshallpayhermaintenanceattherateofRs.2,000/> (Rupees Two thousand) per month. Hence, he shall pay Rs.2,000/> (Rupees Two thousand)  for the petitioner and Rs.1,000/>(RupeesOnethousand)forherminordaughteri.e. total Rs.3,000/> (Rs.2000 + Rs.1,000/>). Hence, it is ordered that thesaidamountshall beremittedtoheronheraddress within the 10th day of every English calendar month and the moneyordercharge,ifany,shallbebornebytherespondent. Itismadeclearthatthismaintenanceshallbeentitledtothe petitionerw.e.f.01.06.2015payablewithin10thJuly,2015and therespondentshallcontinuetopaythemaintenanceinterms of this order.

 The petitioner will not get any arrears of maintenanceinthepeculiarcircumstancesofthiscase.Forthe change in the circumstances the respondent shall remain at libertytoapproachtheFamilyCourtforalternation/cancellation ofthisorder. Accordingly, this petition stands allowed to the extentasindicatedabove. Supply a copy of this order to the respondent by registeredpostwithA.D.asexpeditiouslyaspossibleasnone hasappearedfortherespondentwhenthematteristakenup fordisposal.