Md.Mujafar Ali And 2 ORS. v. State Of Tripura
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFTRIPURA AGARTALA CRL.A.No.24of2011 1. Md.MujafarAli,
2. Md.MubarakAli,
3. Mst.HachibunNessa
!
.........Appellants -Versus- TheStateofTripura ........Respondent BEFORE THEHON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.TALAPATRA "
: #$ %
$ % " : # # $ %
& :'('))'*(
% $ &+,- :30.04.2015 . &: Yes No √
JUDGMENT&ORDER ! /012)3 $ % + $ 4
& 4&+ % '1'0)'** % ! 062 !7 3 )'*' $ & !
8 9$ 4&+ '1'0)'**
% % 16: ; /1;
< $ % /2 3 $ & + + $ #*''''7 $+ = + + + +;
%
< + & /')7/'197/'> /1; [2] - .
$ & 4
*+
& + $ 9& + ;++ $ +
&
& $
$ +
$ + $ !$ & &%& + %
% $ % %
+ ?% %
& + ++ + + % + & $& 4
*-
$ &4 '*'0)'*' + .
2.13 % + +
) & + 5
% + @ + % + +
& = 5
% + (-@
+ &
0 -@
& % "
+ & & +
& ! +
& 4 2?=7*3 [3] 9 + *)6 )'*' 16: 7/'197/1 ;
& %& + %& & &
%& &A + ++ &!& + & &
$ $ 16: /1; /'19 /1 ; /') /1 ; !
+ [4] ! & + $ *(23 02%3
+ $ % 2?=7* 703
& <
+ + ; 4
)23
= + /*/ $ % $ % $ +& 4&+ $ % B "27. In view of my above findings over the points, it is established that the accused persons committed no offence punishable under Section 304@B/306 of the I.P.C. They also committed no offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. Prosecutionfailedtobringhomethesecharges against the accused persons. But the prosecution evidence successfully established under Section 498@A read with Section 34 of I.P.C. It is established by the evidence that accusedpersonscommittedoffencepunishable under Section 498@A read with Section 34 of theI.P.C." [5] #$ &
+
$ + + & 4
+ 4 ++& + $ + &
$
++ $
& ! 4 2?=7*3 &
+ 5 +
$ + 4
& + % +
$ #$ = C 5& 5
Appasaheb and another vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR2007SC763,ManjuRamKalita Vs. State of Assam, 2010 (2) GLT (SC) 27, Arunava Bhowmik vs. State of Assam, 2005 (1) GLT45BillalMiaandanothervs.StateofTripura 2010(2)GLT736 AnupKr.Guhavs.StateofTripuraand another, (2014)1TLR397.! %
&
$ + $
+ + $ % & $
+ & + $ $ % 16: ; [6] "
+ # & # % + < % $ +
& ++& 16: /1 ; +$ +&4&+ % [7] " & % + + $
%
$ .* 4 + 9& + &
*+
$ 4
% + $ & % + + +
! + $% + % + 4 &
$
!
"
# $ # " %
9 + $ + #(''''7 % % + $ ;%& &- [8] .) 9
)
[9] ./ &
$ + 5
& [10] .1 .
+ & &
% % & $ + % + !$ + #(''''7 5 & $ + + &
.1 $ #(''''7 " & $
$ +
$ $
*
% + .1
1 ( $4
*
$ $ & ! .1 & & &
2./3 & & + + + $ *( $ -'*'0)'*' .1& + & & $
A *( +
* + = 5 %
!
%
+5 4 2?=7*3 ;
= + + + & + + +5 + ++
& + +
?%& & $&
% & +
&
+ +#(''''7 + % +?% +
* + + #(''''7
& + & + $ [11] .(
9& +
*+
+$ $ + +5 & & +
=#(''''7
&
9 + % + + + +
* @
+&
$ $ +
$ %
& &
4 + + + *( $ & + + +'*'0)'*'
) + +
D $ & +
% !$ & + $ & .( < & < 2?=7/3 [12] .>! $
++ $ +$ C & 9
5 .1 + +
+ & $ )7/ $ % + + + +
* $ & !
& + +
4 + + + 5 %& % + + .1 = % 5 + ++ + + 9 +
+ $ % + $ [13] .0 " A
& + + [14] @ = + .: + + .1 9 + % % ;
+ @ 2.13 [15] .6E
& $& +& $ +
= + [16] .*'5 9 @+ . B "I constructed a house for them and Dilwara lived with her husband there for two years. During her staying in my house Mujafar beat and assaulted my daughter on the demand of money. Mujafar also threatened me and assaulted me on some occasions. Mujafar demandedtotransfermyhouseinhisname.I did not agree to it. After staying in my house for two years, Dilwara went to her father's houseatBhadranagar.ThereDilwaradelivered child.Shethenwentbacktoherin@lawshouse withthechild.Afterstayforfewmonthsinin@ lawshouseshewasbeatenupandwasdriven outonthedemandofRs.50,000/@tobepaidby herfather.Shethentakenshelterinthehouse of her father with the child. But after three days stay Mujafar took back the child to his
home.Sotherewasadisputeandattemptwas taken through mediator. Mujafar and his parentsrefusedtogivebackthechild.Soafter mediation my daughter went back to her in laws house. But after 15 days she committed suicidebytakingpoison.Beforetwomonthsof herdeathIwenttoherin@lawshousetomeet with her, but her mother@in@law misbehaved with me and did not permit to meet with my daughter as cash and articles not given in the marriage.'
&
= + % & [17] .**!
4 4 .1 [18] .*)
C
- + + = + *)6 )'*' 5 &
$ $= 4 $ $ 9& + [19] .*/ $ +& & [20] .*1 + % + .+ ; *)6)'*' %& < + +
[21] .*( $+ $ %& + .*1 -
+ & %& + & &
/'19716: 7/1; [22] ! % + = + + $" 492 .*3 # 2 .)3-
$ + $ & [23] . +
$ %
$ % = & %& + + + + &
$ $
* + +$ .*' $ %& & % %
$ .1 .(
* $ &$ ! &% $
+$ .*' ! + + + + + + %
&+ 4+ + + *( $ 4& ++ $ +&
! ! %+ $ +
&$
++ + ?= + & + & ++
+ 9 && < $ ! % &
) /
+ + $ $ + % % +% /)2*3?%
+ + ; Appasaheb Vs. State of Maharashtra, = + $ + +$
& $ +& &+ = & + & $! % $
$ < + & + /'19;;ManjuRamKalita vs.StateofAssam, = + $
$ + 16: ;; % ManjuRamKalitavs.StateofAssam
$ + = 16: ; + $ + + & $ % ; +7
$ & + &&& %$
$ %+ ++ ; + 4
$
$7 $
=+$ +
&& + $<
+ F
$G
% 16: ; & + = + + $ +
$@ ; Arunava Guha vs. State of Assam C 5& % &
$ & + 16: ;; BillalMiahvs.StateofTripuraandanother, B 'ifthedeceasedwastreatedwithsuchcruelty as defined in Section 498A IPC, the witness, moreparticularly,themotherandthebrothers of the deceased should have been able to specifically narrate the same. They simply stated that the deceased was assaulted. The word 'assault' without indicating the nature and extent of hurt/injury, if any, sustained cannot be sufficient to the alleged conduct of the appellants falls within the definition of Section498@AofI.P.C.and306ofI.P.C.' [24] ; &
) /
& = + & + % $ %+ +
+$ % /1 ; % +9 &
+$ /1 ;+ /1; %
+ $ %
++
+ $+ " ++
@
% ++
+
& & & + $ % + +[DaniSingh&Ors.vs.StateofBihar, (2004) 13 SCC 203]. " +
$ $ " %& ++ = % $ % + &
+ !
$ %
+ ++ + % +
+ % %$ &
) /+ +
$ + /1;5
) /
& [25] 5 %& $ < + & 16: 7/1 ; "
+ %
*
$ &% % & +
* + ++
$ ++ ! +
$ %
$ $ < + = % 16: ; ! % %& + $ $ + = % 16: ; ! + & $ H+ <
@ . &
*
% I ! = Manju Ram Kalita vs. State of Assam &
$ %
$ $
=+$+
&& + % + 4 $ + +&& + ++
% + & + $ <
% 16: ; ! $ % = &
*!
* < + & + 16: ; [26]
< % %+&4&+ ! & + % & ;
D# JUDGE