Partha Deb v. The State Of Tripura And ORS
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFTRIPURA AGARTALA W.P.(C)No.132of2015 W.P.(C)No.324of2015 W.P(C)No.340of2015 InW.P.(C)No.132of2015 Petitioner: ShriNaniGopalChakraborty@Sannyashi,
! "# ByAdvocate: $ % # Respondents: 1. TheStateofTripura, " & ' ! "# ()
"' ) "
'" *
+#,
! "# 2. TheDeputySecretary & ' ! "# ()
"' ) "
'" *
+#,
! "# 3. TheJointTransportCommissioner,
!" ''
& ' ! "#
! "# 4. ShriSamirPaul,
# !) " $ -) #"
! "#
[2] ByAdvocate: $
(
& $ + InW.P.(C)No.324of2015 Petitioner: ShriParthaDeb, $ % '' .
"#
/ +
&' ! "# ByAdvocate: $ (
Respondents: 1. TheStateofTripura, " & ' ! "# / #
"' ) "
'" *
+#,
! "# 2. TheDistrictMagistrate&Collector &' ! "# .
"#
/ + #
&' ! "# 3. TheDistrictMagistrate&Collector,
& ' ! "#
)
'
4. TheJointTransportCommissioner,
!" ''
& ' ! "#
! "# 5. ShriAmiyaDey, ,
$ 0
) ' 220
[3] 6. ShriRatanDebnath,
$ 0
) ' 7. ShriRatanDebbarma, $
#$ '
$ 0
) ' ByAdvocate: $
(
& $
% , InW.P.(C)No.340of2015 Petitioner: ShriTapasSarkar, # #
#
! "# ByAdvocate: $ '
Respondents: 1. TheStateofTripura, " "
& ' ! "# "' / # ) "
'" *
+#,
)"
'" * ! "# 2. ThePrincipalSecretary
"' !" ) "
'" *
+#,
) "
'" * ! "# 3. ThePrincipalSecretary, 320
[4]
"' / # )"
'" *
+#,
) "
'" * ! "# 4. TheDistrictMagistrate&Collector, ! "#
! "# 5. ShriAmiyoDey(Group:D,UR),
$ 0 )
'
6. ShriRatanDebbarma(Group:D,UR),
$ 0 )
'
7. ShriRatanDebnath(Group:D,UR),
$ 0 )
'
ByAdvocate: $ !
$,#'
& $
% , BEFORE THEHON'BLEMR.JUSTICES.TALAPATRA
:12 1356
# ' :23.11.2015
" : Yes No √ JUDGMENT&ORDER ) " 78 521 1356
&"
78 2191356
78 293
!" #" 420
[5] * ",
# ' " '
'" ' /# 53 ! "#& ' :
/# )
) '
32 1355
" 23; #""' ' #&#"< '"
%#
" )
)#
) ) " W.P.(C)No.132of2015 [2] =
) " " ' &"
'
/ ' ( / ' ' () "' & ' ! "# )
35 5444 5444 *# <>5 ) " -
# # ?
)
0
# # ! "#.
"#)
3@ - ) # "" &#"< '" ' ( / ' ' ()
"' & ' ! "# / 9623<52333>< ) & / 5133>< 7%<58 ) ) '
' ' ' ' ' #' 1A 3@ 1355 *# <>9 ) 520
[6] " = "" ' 1A 3@ 1355 " , &#"< '" (/B ' () "'
"#
' ' #' 25 1355 *# <>@ ) " " &#"< '" (/B ' =
" B' # = '
1C 1355 *# <>C ) " ) "#
!
" B ' ) ''
) '
# " 9 "
) "#" "' " '
/# 53 % " " 9) # "' "
'
"' () " 9 ) " ' " 7 *# <>53 ) " 8
" 9 "" " 7?*< 8& <===&#"<# (/B ' "' () # " / 6253<19333>< ) & / 5C33>< % 1 ) ) '
1A 1352 *# <>55 ) " !
" '
) "
"' 1A 1352 *# <>55 ) "
# 620
[7] "'
# '# "' ' <#'<'
"#" " ''# !"
"' 15 3C 1352 *# <>52 ) " ) ''#
! /
#:# ! &#"# D "Subject : Promotion of Regular Group:D employeestothepostofDriveronseniority: cum:meritbasis:clarificationthereof. Sir, I am directed to refer your letter No.F.2: 38/ESTT/TRP & PGT/86/1542 dated 05th July,2013andtoinformyouthatasperRule 10(b)(c)oftheTripuraGovernmentDrivers Services Rules, 1979, 30% of total posts of Driversaretobefilledupbypromotion.So, promotion is to be given on the basis of senioritycombinedwithmerit. Therefore, I am directed to request you to kindly take necessary action for giving promotion to the recommended Group:D employeestothepostofDriversonthebasis ofSeniority:cum:merit." [3] % ' ' #' 59 1359
" " # # <53 78 ! "# & '
/# 54@4 7@ ' ' 823;" #" "' ' #&#"< '"
" # <53 78 ! "# & ' /# 54@4 7@ ' ' 8 !" "' # ) # &#"< '" "' " 720
[8] )
' #
"' !
!"
"' '' &#"< '" " "' # #" "' " = #
" "' ) "' "
' " " !" "' '
# !
# "' "
"' - <#'<' '
" )
"' &#"< '" "&#"< !
"
' ) #
)
"" " 9 '"# 1A 1352 " 5 2
""
" 31 !
" )
" <" !
" #'
# " ) #
'"# 1A 1352
"
" "' " " !
"'
" <#'<' !
"
# Tapan Chandra Lodh and others vs. State of Tripura and others F 820
[9]
3@ 1359 785331359G) # D "This Court finds sufficient force in the submission of Mr. Datta Majumder, learned G.A. that since the post of driver is non: selection post, it is not the merit but the seniority shall be given preference over. Accordingly, the contention of Mr. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners is rejectedbythisCourt. However, it is made clear that until and unless this merit list as published vide memorandumdated20.06.2013,Annexure:2 to the writ petition is exhausted no person shall be appointed from the subsequent meritlist." [4] !
" " 1356) " 9 )"" &#"< "
"" ' 1C 1355 ' " 9 "" )
' "#
-
"' " [5] !
" 9 # <
' "
D "In respect to Draft Seniority List and Final Seniority List of Peon in LR's Establishment of Law Department, the respondent No.4 submits, that, the respondent's No.4 seniority ought to be determined by taking into account the period served by him as DRW before his regularisation. As the respondent No.4 before his regularization serving as contingent DRW Driver, in computingtheseniorityinthepostofdriver 920
[10] during which he served as DRW Driver shouldbereckonedwith." !
" 9
" # ' # # '" 53 # #" / [6]
# <
"
" # )
" < )
5@ 1339 54 133@ ) # ) # 1C 1353 ) ) # H
"' # )
/ [7] $ % # # "" " $
(
# ""
" ) $ + # "" " = "" "
< <""
" H' ' ' " 9 "" # "
"#" # " 9 '
1020
[11] W.P.(C)No.324of2015 [8] =
) " " ' '
# " &#"<
'
&'
' ' #' 5C 3A 133C )
35 133@ - ' ))
!" "'
# "#" "' " ? # !" "' ''
' " ' ' #' 13 3A 1352 *# <>9 ) " " "" # & <=== # " 60A ""
= ' "#
'" # )"#
!
" B ' "" 6C@ &#"< '"
'
7/ # 8 "#
' ' #' 75<%8<
$> >?
!!>?
!!>133A>14@A<C6 15 3C 1356 ) ' " 6"" 66@ " B A' A36 "
" " " A "" " 2 ' '"# ' ' #'
14 3A 1352 *# <>6 ) " !
" ''# 1120
[12] 3C 1352 ' ' #' 59 1359 " "
# TapanChandraLodhandothersvs.State of Tripura and others F 3@ 1359 78 5331359G
TapanChandraLodh andothersvs.StateofTripuraandothers,,# ' 24.06.2015 W.A.No.53of2014) )
'
3@ 1359 78 533 1359
%
# ) # /# 78
/# #
# # )# # ' )# "' " )
= # D ITherefore, we find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly rejected. We also uphold the direction of the learned Single Judge that the select list of Group:D employees found suitable shall remain valid till it is totally exhausted. Only thereafter fresh recruitment of driver by promotion fromGroup:Demployeesshallbestarted.It is, however, made clear that since we have given this interpretation to the Rules, the State shall follow this interpretation in all the departments and will not follow any othersysteminanyothercase. [9] $ (
# "" "
#'
J# '"
"" ' " A ) #
# 1220
[13] [10] $
(
& ""
" " # "#
) $
% , # "" " 6A0@ = " @ "' !
# "
' #
"" ' [11] !
" #
" = " # "
W.P.(C)No.340of2015 [12] =
) " " ' !" '
#"" " &#"<
'
! "#
15 3C 544@ " / @@6<5523>< - ' ) )
!"
"'
# "#" "' " " ) # # !" "'
# ) ''# $ 0 ! "# ' ' #' 13 3A 1352 *# </>2 #
" 59 H' 1320
[14] " #
#"#
&#"< '" ) #
'
7/ # 8 "" " " 2C2 ) " " 6 66@ " A A32 " @ A36 "
" "" "' / " 6 0 @ "" " #"
" "
3C 3C 1359 *# </>5 #
" [13] !
" " 6A0@ " #
!
" !" "' ''
' "
"' " #" " < 52
#
# D "It is evident that on receipt of recommended list of eligible group:D employees from Transport Department for promotion like West District. The Dhalai District has considered promotion of 3(three) officials under Group:D category who are junior to the petitioner without maintaining the process of DPC that caused seriousdislocationinconsideringpromotion ofrecommended Group:Demployees under the Revenue Department by holding DPC wherein the petitioner may got a chance of consideration." 1420
[15] [14] = #
" 6A 0 @ '" )
# " ' "
) " ' " " !
# ) )
" # /# 53 78 )
" "
,# '
# [15] $ '
# "" " ) $ !
$,#'
& ""
" $
% , # "" " 6A0@ [16] # "" " ) "
"
'# ' #
# [17] - "" #'
' # "
# # " # ' "' " ' /# 5378! "#& ' /# 54@4 ="
"#" "' ' # &#"< '" '
!" "' ) # ) 1520
[16] !
# #' ##
) ' '" # ) #/# 78) #
# # )# J# ' - "' , )
=
" ) "' ) ) '
= ""
78 521 1356 '"# 1A 1352 *# <>55 ) " " 9 "" "' " #" " ) '
" = # " 9 # ) # &#"< " )# " , " B ) #"
"
# 271A8<( >?<2>34
1C 1353 ) " B < )
5@ 1339 133@ # ) # !
" " 9 # "#" # " & ' # ) " # !
# 1620
[17] # ' # "" ' &#"< '" ' # '" #
"
# #"
"
"
'"# 1A 1352 *# <>55 ) " ) " 9 "" "' " ' #
1A 1352
J#
!
< ' ''
" B "" ' "' " ) #
# = #
* ' "" ' "' " '" )
" ' ' !
'' ' !"
"' # ''
= ' # " &#"< '"
# # !" "' "" " [18] = 78 2191356 "" " A # ,# " ' 1720
[18] "" "' '"# ' ' #' 14 3A "" ' " @ " "' " # '# " @)""
# !
= ) " /# 5378 ! "# & ' /# 54@4 " '
# ' ' #' 14 3A 1352 "" ' " A # #
"" ' )
!
< ' ''
" B "" ' "' " ) #
# = #
* ' "" ' "' " '" )
" ' ' !
'' ' !"
"' # ''
= ' # " &#"< '"
# # !" "' "" " 1820
[19] [19] =
78 293 1356
" '
# " # )
"" " 6 0 @ !
"'
# &#"< ) ,# " ) #' "
# #
"' ''
&#"< '" # / # "' !
" '
"' # '"# ' ' #' 3C 3C 1359 *# </>5 )
!
< ' ''
" B "" ' "' " ) #
# = #
* ' "" ' "' " '" )
" ' ' !
'' ' !" "' # '' = ' # " &#"< '"
# # !" "'
"" " 1920
[20] [20] - #'#
'
" ,# '' <K< " ) "" '
)
!
"" '
'' ' ' ' ) '"# "" ' "' "
) '
!
" ) "" ' ' # ' '' )# )# # J# )
# # # # " * # " "" ' # J# " ' # !" "'
) " ) *
"
) JUDGE 2020