Md. Aynal Haque v. State Of West Bengal
24.12.2025 Item Nos.1 to 37 Ct. No.01 RP CR/1212/1961 (MD. AYNAL HAQUE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL) CR/1214/1961 (MD. AYNAL HAQUE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.) CR/1216/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR) CR/1217/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR) CR/1218/1961 MINOR SERAJUL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
CR/1219/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF CR/1220/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF CR/1221/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF CR/1222/1961 (MINOR SERAJUL HAQUE Vs STATE OF CR/1223/1961 (MUSSMT. JAMILA KHATUN Vs STATE OF CR/1224/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1225/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST
CR/1227/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1228/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1229/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1230/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1231/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1232/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1233/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1234/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR REZAK Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1235/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF CR/1236/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF CR/1237/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF CR/1238/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1239/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF
CR/1240/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF CR/1241/1961 + CR/1242/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1243/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENAGL) CR/1244/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1245/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1246/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1247/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1248/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1249/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1250/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RASHID Vs STATE OF WEST CR/1251/1961 (SHAIKH ABDUR RAIEKH Vs THE STATE OF PER, SUJOY PAUL, ACJ.:
1. None appears for the parties. These are the matters of 1961. It appears that nothing
remains to be adjudicated in these matters and parties have lost interest.
2. The petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim orders, if there be any, stands hereby vacated.
[SUJOY PAUL, ACJ.] [AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.]