Taslima Bibi v. The State Of West Bengal

06.01.2025 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (A) 31 of 2025 sl no. 44 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 482 of BNSS 2023 in connection with Murshidabad P.S Case no. 207 of 2024 dated 24.3.2024 under sections 341/325/326/307/506/34 IPC and section 24 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act and In Re : Taslima Bibi ...... petitioner Mr. D Samanta Mr. Samrat Ghosh ...... for the petitioner Mr. S Bardhan Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee ...... for the State

1. Petitioner contends he was not aware of the application for pre-arrest bail which had been turned down earlier by a coordinate Bench.

2. Learned lawyer for the State submits the said Bench had considered the materials on record and dismissed the application.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Earlier application had been affirmed by the petitioner's daughter. Though he contends his daughter was not authorized to do so, we find the co-ordinate Bench had considered the materials in the case diary and rejected the prayer for prearrest bail.

4. Under such circumstances we find no reason to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail.

5. It shall be open to the petitioner to appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within seven days from date. In the event he does so, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered independently and in accordance with law.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)