Rajlaxmi Rice Mill v. United Bank Of India

05.08.2024.

Court No. 13 Sl. No. 12 sp F.A. No. 167 of 1993 Rajlaxmi Rice Mill

Versus

United Bank of India

1. None appears for the parties in an old appeal of the year 1993.

2. Hence, F.A. 167 of 1993 shall stand dismissed for default.

3. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

4. In view of the above, connected applications, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Let the L.C.R. be returned, if any, to the Court below.

7. The registry shall communicate a copy of this order to the Court below.

8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)