Bidyut Bag v. State Of West Bengal And ANR
03.02.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Item No.13 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.
Rejected C.R.M. (M) 69 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Tarakeswar Police Station Case No. 294 of 2025 dated 01.08.2025 under Sections 137(2)/140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and charge-sheet submitted under Sections 137(2)/140(3)/64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
And In Re : Bidyut Bag ... Petitioner.
Mr. Abhra Mukherjee, Mr. Sauradeep Dutta, Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee, Mr. Himadree Ghosh ... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Ms. Ankita Paul ... For the State.
Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 183 days and the victim is intentionally avoiding the court.
Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the case diary and drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim.
Having considered the medical evidence as well as the victim's statement, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail at this stage. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
Learned Special Court would ensure that the victim is examined within a reasonable period of time.
Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the victim is over.
Case diary be returned to learned advocate appearing for the State.
The application for bail, being CRM (M) 69 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)