Jiaul Hoque And ORS v. State Of West Bengal
(AD) 25.01.2022 Court No.29 C.R.M. (A) 33 of 2022 (Via Video Conference) (Rejected) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Rejinagar P.S. Case No. 132 of 2018 dated 07/06/2018 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In the matter of: - Jiaul Hoque & Ors.
...petitioners.
Ms. Shabana Hasin ... for the petitioners.
Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ...for the State.
Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that all the three petitioners are proclaimed offenders. Considering the fact that the petitioners are proclaimed offenders, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
C.R.M. (A) 33 of 2022 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)