← Library
Calcutta High CourtSA/143/2019dismissed

Harun Rashid v. Raju Das @ Raju Rajak & ORS

2022-12-13Hon'Ble Justice Harish Tandon,Hon'Ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen2 pages

13.12.2022 SA 143 of 2019 with I.A No. CAN 1 of 2016(Old CAN No. 9838 of 2016) Ct-08 Harun Rashid Vs.

Raju Das @ Raju Rajak & Ors.

ar The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.

On the earlier occasion on the prayer of the learned counsel representing the appellant, time to file the substitution application was extended for two weeks from 29th November, 2022.

The department has reported that no such application is filed in the department within the aforesaid time.

In view of failure to file substitution application within the aforesaid time, the appeal stands dismissed as abated.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Uday Kumar ,J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)